2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-97289-3_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blockchain: Trends and Future

Abstract: Blockchain has attracted a great deal of attention due to its secure way of distributing transactions between different nodes without a trust entity, and tracking the validity of data. Although many experts argue the solutions to several problems in today's inherently insecure Internet lies with blockchain technology because of its security and privacy features, there is no systemic survey to analyze and summarize blockchain technology from different perspectives. In this paper, we present the current trends i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We conceptually adapt and link existing domain-specific maturity models using the approach proposed by Paché and Spalanzani (2007) to develop a conceptual framework for supply chain maturity linking organization, sustainability, and digitalization. Furthermore, we use blockchain (Swan, 2015;Yang et al, 2018;Herneth, 2019;Xu et al, 2019) and smart contract development stages (Szabo, 1997;Clack et al, 2016;Savelyev, 2017) as contextualizing and influencing factors. Figure 3 depicts the underlying relationships between the three domain-specific concepts of maturity and contextual factors.…”
Section: A Conceptual Framework For Supply Chain Maturity Linking Organization Digitalization and Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We conceptually adapt and link existing domain-specific maturity models using the approach proposed by Paché and Spalanzani (2007) to develop a conceptual framework for supply chain maturity linking organization, sustainability, and digitalization. Furthermore, we use blockchain (Swan, 2015;Yang et al, 2018;Herneth, 2019;Xu et al, 2019) and smart contract development stages (Szabo, 1997;Clack et al, 2016;Savelyev, 2017) as contextualizing and influencing factors. Figure 3 depicts the underlying relationships between the three domain-specific concepts of maturity and contextual factors.…”
Section: A Conceptual Framework For Supply Chain Maturity Linking Organization Digitalization and Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Digital capabilities for Frontiers in Blockchain | www.frontiersin.org collaborative supply chain management evolve, introducing basic algorithms for planning, forecasting, and decision support to introduce predictive analytics (Cruijssen, 2020) and strengthen alignment across organizational boundaries (Herneth, 2018). Smart terms (SmC 1.0) emerge by leveraging e.g., blockchain-technologies toward distributed ledger-based smart contracts (Swan, 2015;Yang et al, 2018;Xu et al, 2019). Consequently, smart contract code (SmC 2.0) refers to coded components of traditional legal contracts negotiated by human contractual parties.…”
Section: Intra-organizational Maturitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over time, it has been observed that the development of blockchain can be organized into 3 generations [19][20][21], as follows.…”
Section: Development Of Blockchain Implementationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The participants' transaction data in a network is stored in the distributed ledger [16]. Hence, a blockchain relies on a "Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT)" which is distributed across several computing nodes or devices [17]. Before a transaction can be stored in the ledger, most of the blockchain network participants must give and record their consents.…”
Section: Blockchain Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%