2015
DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2014-202805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blood and lymphatic vessel invasion in pT1 colorectal cancer: an international concordance study

Abstract: A uniform criterion strongly influences the diagnostic consistency of BLI but may not always improve the concordance. Further study is required to achieve an objective diagnosis of BLI in colorectal cancer. The varying effects of diagnostic criterion on the pathologists from Japan, the USA/Canada and Europe might reflect varied interpretations of the criterion. Internationally accepted criterion should be developed by participants from around the world.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many NETs were found to be smaller than 10 mm in this study. Therefore, vascular invasion in rectal NET with a small size can be concordantly assessed ( 15 , 16 ). Pathological analyses used in treatment algorithms should be designed to ensure objectivity in the assessment of vascular invasion in NET.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many NETs were found to be smaller than 10 mm in this study. Therefore, vascular invasion in rectal NET with a small size can be concordantly assessed ( 15 , 16 ). Pathological analyses used in treatment algorithms should be designed to ensure objectivity in the assessment of vascular invasion in NET.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lymphovascular invasion was confirmed by D2‐40 immunostaining and EM staining and morphological criteria as previously described …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lymphovascular invasion was confirmed by D2-40 immunostaining and EM staining and morphological criteria as previously described. 23 Regarding tumour budding, an epithelial focus in the tumour with no more than five cells on H&E staining was defined as a bud. 6,16,24 CK AE1/AE3 immunostaining was used for confirmation of the buds.…”
Section: Pathological Study Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have examined the quality of microscopic evaluation by comparing the results of slide sets scored by different groups of pathologists [25][26][27][28] ; however, clinical relevance is more directly investigated if the relation of a prognostic factor with outcome is evaluated. Therefore, we examined the prognostic value of the different histologic factors in both the SSR and NR settings and compared their AIC values, as is often used in comparing different staging systems.…”
Section: Year Of Diagnosis Proportion Of Reports (%)mentioning
confidence: 99%