2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blood cardiac biomarkers responses are associated with 24 h ultramarathon performance

Abstract: Purpose Clinical significance of cardiac biomarkers response in ultra-endurance runners are not completely elucidated because events vary in distance/duration and competitors modulate running intensity according to individual running capacity. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between self-selected exercise intensity with cardiac biomarkers comparing experienced (EXP, N = 11) and novice (NOV, N = 14) runners able to finish a 24h ultramarathon (24UM) with significant differences… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results thus suggest a high level of cardiac stress immediately after the 24‐h ultramarathon race. This finding is consistent with the increase in cardiac‐specific troponin T levels observed immediately after another 24‐h ultramarathon run 5 . Although the troponin assay was of a different generation in this study, the values for well‐trained athletes (~0.01 ng/ml 5 ) were comparable to our values (34 ng/L).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Our results thus suggest a high level of cardiac stress immediately after the 24‐h ultramarathon race. This finding is consistent with the increase in cardiac‐specific troponin T levels observed immediately after another 24‐h ultramarathon run 5 . Although the troponin assay was of a different generation in this study, the values for well‐trained athletes (~0.01 ng/ml 5 ) were comparable to our values (34 ng/L).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Twenty runners participated in this quasiexperimental study, and were divided into an amateur-level group ( n = 10) and a high-level group ( n = 10) according to their training levels [ 34 ]. The high-level group was made up of runners who trained for a minimum of 8 h/week and achieved positive accumulated slopes of more than 50,000 m in the 12 months before the test.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often, the organizers change the running direction, for example in the Taipei 24-h UM run (treadmill 400 m, changing the running direction every 4 h) [2]. However, loop shapes are mainly dependent on technical capabilities, from extremely uncomfortable with turns at a 180-degree angle, to routes running on different surfaces (dirt ground) with slight slopes [3]. Organizers often forget that loop shape not only affects the final score but also the athlete's health during the run and regeneration afterwards.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%