1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0305-4179(99)00046-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blood crossmatching for burn surgery: potential for reduced wastage using a modified Dye formula

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Along with subjective and variable estimations of intraoperative blood loss, blood product ordering remains inconsistent with documented tendencies to under‐order products, which can compromise patient safety if adequate resuscitation products are not available when needed 3 . Donated blood is a valuable resource, so ordering only what is needed reduces the cost and delay in re‐cross matching unused blood to be available for other patients 6,7 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Along with subjective and variable estimations of intraoperative blood loss, blood product ordering remains inconsistent with documented tendencies to under‐order products, which can compromise patient safety if adequate resuscitation products are not available when needed 3 . Donated blood is a valuable resource, so ordering only what is needed reduces the cost and delay in re‐cross matching unused blood to be available for other patients 6,7 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Donated blood is a valuable resource, so ordering only what is needed reduces the cost and delay in re-cross matching unused blood to be available for other patients. 6,7 Many previous studies have examined factors that are associated with blood transfusion in burn patients, both intraoperatively and over their hospital course. This study demonstrated that amount of burn excised in the operating room was strongly associated with the number of blood products given, which correlates well with previous findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations