Blood pressure phenotype reproducibility in CKD outpatients: a clinical practice report

Cupisti, Adamasco; Bruno, Rosa Maria; Puntoni, Alessandro; Varricchio, Enrico; Giglio, Elisabetta; Meniconi, Ophelia; Zullo, Claudia; Barsotti, M; Egidi, Maria Francesca; Ghiadoni, Lorenzo

doi:10.1007/s11739-019-02127-y

Cited by 4 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As the definition of masked hypertension and office-based hypertension needs both office and out-of-office BP measurements, a further crucial point is whether this fair reproducibility could be a result of low reproducibility of one of these components. Although there are no sufficient data to answer this question, two studies from our meta-analysis checked the two types of measurements separately and evaluated the reproducibility for each component [12,20]. Authors reported that the scant reproducibility of office BP could explain the limited reproducibility of BP phenotypes.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…1). We deemed eligible 15 studies for the meta-analysis enrolling a total of 5729 patients (Table 1) [9][10][11][12][13][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. The summary of risk of bias assessment in the conversion is presented in Supplementary Material 2, http://links.lww.com/HJH/B892.…”

Section: Overview Of Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In masked hypertension, estimates for reproducibility were based on data from 11 studies for ABPM [9][10][11]13,18,19,21,22,26,27] and six studies for HBPM [9,12,19,20,23,26]. The reproducibility was better with ABPM, kappa reliability test: 0.41 (95% CI: 0.32-0.49, Fig.…”

Section: Reproducibility Of Masked Hypertension and Office-based Hype...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In office-based hypertension, estimates for reproducibility were based on data from six studies for ABPM [9][10][11]13,21,24] and two studies for HBPM [12,23]. The reproducibility with both methods was very low, indicating a slight agreement between the two different measurements in this population, regardless of the method for the out-ofoffice BP repeated measurement.…”

Section: Reproducibility Of Masked Hypertension and Office-based Hype...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Despite the importance of these phenotypes, few studies have evaluated the reproducibility of masked hypertension and office-based hypertension over the time. Studies assessed the reproducibility of the phenomenon, discuss about an acceptable reproducibility of hypertension phenotypes but over short periods of time [9][10][11][12]. Nevertheless, poor reproducibility reported in the long-term studies might depict clinical and/or therapeutic modifications and not necessarily lack of reproducibility [13].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Reproducibility of masked hypertension and office-based hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Antza

Farmakis

Doundoulakis

et al. 2022

Journal of Hypertension

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Overview Of Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Reproducibility Of Masked Hypertension and Office-based Hype...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Reproducibility Of Masked Hypertension and Office-based Hype...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Reproducibility of masked hypertension and office-based hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Antza

Farmakis

Doundoulakis

et al. 2022

Journal of Hypertension

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Blood pressure phenotype: an evolving picture

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The long-term reproducibility of the white-coat effect on blood pressure as a continuous variable from the Ohasama Study

Satoh

Yoshida

Metoki

et al. 2023

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is little information about the reproducibility of the white coat effect, which was treated as a continuous variable. To investigate a long-term interval reproducibility of the white-coat effect as a continuous variable. We selected 153 participants without antihypertensive treatment (men, 22.9%; age, 64.4 years) from the general population of Ohasama, Japan, to assess the repeatedly measured white-coat effect (the difference between blood pressures at the office and home) in a 4-year interval. The reproducibility was assessed by testing the intraclass correlation coefficient (two-way random effect model-single measures). The white-coat effect for systolic/diastolic blood pressure slightly decreased by 0.17/1.56 mmHg at the 4-year visit on average. The Bland–Altman plots showed no significant systemic error for the white-coat effects (P ≥ 0.24). The intraclass correlation coefficient (95% confidence interval) of the white-coat effect for systolic blood pressure, office systolic blood pressure, and home systolic blood pressure were 0.41 (0.27–0.53), 0.64 (0.52–0.74), and 0.74 (0.47–0.86), respectively. Change in the white-coat effect was mainly affected by a change in office blood pressure. Long-term reproducibility of the white-coat effect is limited in the general population without antihypertensive treatment. The change in the white-coat effect is mainly caused by office blood pressure variation.

show abstract

Blood pressure phenotype reproducibility in CKD outpatients: a clinical practice report

Cited by 4 publications

References 27 publications

Reproducibility of masked hypertension and office-based hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Reproducibility of masked hypertension and office-based hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Blood pressure phenotype: an evolving picture

The long-term reproducibility of the white-coat effect on blood pressure as a continuous variable from the Ohasama Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About