2013
DOI: 10.1111/jch.12206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blood Pressure Variability and Left Ventricular Mass Index in Children

Abstract: Clinical implications of blood pressure variability (BPV) on subclinical organ damage in children are unknown. The authors sought to explore the potential utility of two newly derived BPV indices: weighted standard deviation (wBPSD) and real average variability (ARV), as well as two standard ambulatory blood pressure indices: average 24-hour systolic blood pressure (SBP) and 24-hour SBP load, to identify children at high risk for left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy (LVH). The study group consisted of 67 consecut… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While most research has suggested that BPV has prognostic value for many stages of CV disease, it is worth noting that a recent Russian study in adults found that 24‐hour BPV did not independently predict LVH . Also in agreement with our findings, a recent pediatric study found only a weak association between 24‐hour BPV and LVMI, and found no relationship between 24‐hour BPV and LVH in children evaluated for hypertension . Another pediatric study examined the relationship of 24‐hour BPV and LVH in pediatric patients with HTN .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While most research has suggested that BPV has prognostic value for many stages of CV disease, it is worth noting that a recent Russian study in adults found that 24‐hour BPV did not independently predict LVH . Also in agreement with our findings, a recent pediatric study found only a weak association between 24‐hour BPV and LVMI, and found no relationship between 24‐hour BPV and LVH in children evaluated for hypertension . Another pediatric study examined the relationship of 24‐hour BPV and LVH in pediatric patients with HTN .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…36 Also in agreement with our findings, a recent pediatric study found only a weak association between 24-hour BPV and LVMI, and found no relationship between 24-hour BPV and LVH in children evaluated for hypertension. 37 Another pediatric study examined the relationship of 24-hour BPV and LVH in pediatric patients with HTN. 38 Investigators determined that daytime systolic SD had significant associations with LVMI after adjustment for age, sex, and BMI z score.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sharma et al analyzed BP SD from ABPM recordings as a measure of BP variability and showed that in children with [3]. In contrast, more sophisticated indices of BP variability, such as the weighted standard deviation and ARV, showed only a weak correlation with the LVMI and were not considered as reliable parameters to identify children at risk for left ventricular hypertrophy [33]. It would appear however that increased BP variability may be associated with the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD), as children with CKD and uncontrolled HTN have higher systolic and diastolic BP variability and lower HR variability; these can be classified as markers of sympathetic nervous system (SNS) overactivity and autonomic nervous system dysfunction [5].…”
Section: Bp Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It is well established that the left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is an important risk factor for cardiovascular and all-cause mortality and morbidity [1][2][3]. A few crosssectional studies have shown that male sex, age, genetics, hemodynamic overload, obesity, hormonal and metabolic factors correlate with LVH [4,5]. Previous studies have reported conflicting results concerning the relationship between serum lipid levels and left ventricular geometry pattern, both in general population and patients with cardiovascular risk [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%