2010
DOI: 10.11650/twjm/1500406031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blow-Up of Positive-Initial-Energy Solutions for an Integro-Differential Equation With Nonlinear Damping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result was later improved by Messaoudi [24], to certain solutions with positive initial energy. A similar result was also obtained by Wu [25] using a different method. For the problem (1.4) in ℝ n and with m = 2, Kafini and Messaoudi [26] showed, for suitable conditions on g and initial data, that solutions with negative energy blow up in finite time.…”
Section: −ξ 1 G(t) ≤ G (T) ≤ −ξ 2 G(t) T ≥ 0supporting
confidence: 86%
“…This result was later improved by Messaoudi [24], to certain solutions with positive initial energy. A similar result was also obtained by Wu [25] using a different method. For the problem (1.4) in ℝ n and with m = 2, Kafini and Messaoudi [26] showed, for suitable conditions on g and initial data, that solutions with negative energy blow up in finite time.…”
Section: −ξ 1 G(t) ≤ G (T) ≤ −ξ 2 G(t) T ≥ 0supporting
confidence: 86%
“…He showed that, under suitable conditions on g, solutions of problem (3) with initial negative energy blow up in finite time if p>m and continue to exist if m p. This result has been later pushed, by the same author [6], to certain solutions with positive initial energy. A similar result has also obtained by Wu [7] using a different method. For problem (3) in R n without the viscoelastic term (g = 0), we cite the works of Levine et al [8], Messaoudi [9], Sun and Wang [10], Yang [11] and Todorova [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…where F(t) = (t)G(t) + CE(t) is equivalent to E(t) because of (22), and k is a positive constant. A simple integration of (56) leads to…”
Section: General Decay Of Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%