1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf02567635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blow-up of solutions to nonlinear wave equations in two space dimensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
48
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, if 1 < p ≤ p c , then the problem (1.1) and (1.2) does not admit global solutions in general. (See R. Agemi [1], S. Alinhac [3], L. Hörmander [7], A. Hoshiga [9], and F. John [10].) Therefore, we shall call the number p c the critical exponent in the following.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Main Result We Consider The Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, if 1 < p ≤ p c , then the problem (1.1) and (1.2) does not admit global solutions in general. (See R. Agemi [1], S. Alinhac [3], L. Hörmander [7], A. Hoshiga [9], and F. John [10].) Therefore, we shall call the number p c the critical exponent in the following.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Main Result We Consider The Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After that Strauss [51] conjectured that the threshold for dividing blowup phenomena in finite time for arbitrary "positive" small initial value and global existence of small solutions is given by An alternative proof of lifespan estimate with critical case p = p S (N) via Gauss's hypergeometric function can be found in Zhou [61] and Zhou-Han [65]. Similar problem can be found for (1.1) with G = |∂ t u| p (see e.g., John [27], Sideris [49], Masuda [43], Schaeffer [48] Rammaha [45], Agemi [1], Hidano-Tsutaya [17] Tzvetkov [55], Zhou [62] and Hidano-Wang-Yokoyama [18]). The complete picture of the blowup phenomena for small solutions can be summarized as follows:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Let ( f 1 , g1 ) and ( f 2 , g 2 ) satisfy (1.3) and let (u, v) be a weak solution of the system (8.1)satisfying supp(u, v) ⊂ {(x, t) ∈ R N × [0, T ) ; |x| ≤ r 0 + t} for r 0 = sup{|x| ; x ∈ supp ( f 1 , f 2 , g 1 , g 2 )}. If Γ GG (N, p, q) = max{F GG(N, p, q), F GG (N, q, p)} ≥ 0, then T has the following upper bound…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…= n+1 n−1 . We refer to the classical works [19,48,28,47,45,1,12,55,64,13] for the proof of this conjecture, although up to the knowledge of the author the global existence in the supercritical case for the not radial symmetric case in high dimensions is still open. Recently, in [30] a blow-up result for 1 < p ≤ p Gla (n) has been proved for a semilinear damped wave model in the scattering case, that is, when the time-dependent coefficient of the damping term b(t)u t is nonnegative and summable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%