Combining the advantages of reactive
crystal facets and engineering
defects is an encouraging way to address the inherent disadvantages
of titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanocrystals. However, revealing
the true photoreactivity origin for defective TiO2 with
coexposed or predominant exposed anisotropic facets is still highly
challenging. Here, the photoreactivity of TiO2 nanocrystals
with respectively predominant exposed {001}, {101}, and {100} facets
before and after Ti3+ doping under both ultraviolet and
visible light was compared systematically. In detail, the photocatalytic
H2 production for R-TiO2-001, R-TiO2-101, and R-TiO2-100 increased by a factor of 1.34, 2.65,
and 3.39 under UV light and a factor of 8.90, 13.47, and 8.72 under
visible light. By contrast, the photocatalytic degradation of methyl
orange for R-TiO2-001, R-TiO2-101, and R-TiO2-100 increased by a factor of 3.18, 1.42, and 2.17 under UV
light and a factor of 4.03, 2.85, and 1.58 under visible light, respectively.
The true photocatalytic activity origin for the obtained photoreduction
and photo-oxidation ability is attributed to the exposure of more
active sites (under-coordinated 5-fold Ti atoms), the facilitated
charge transfer among {001}, {101}, and {100} facets, and the Ti3+ energy state with variable doping levels to extend the visible
light response. This work hopefully provides significant insights
into the photoreactivity origin of defective TiO2 nanocrystals
with anisotropic exposed facets.