2023
DOI: 10.1109/tii.2022.3182972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

$\bm {P}^{\bm {3}}$: Privacy-Preserving Prediction of Real-Time Energy Demands in EV Charging Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The adoption of EV energy consumption models for midemand modeling demonstrates a solution to the scarcity of microscopic EV traffic flow data. This enables the real-time prediction of EV charging requirements and facilitates effective charging coordination based on individual energy requirements, in contrast to real-time charger requirement modeling in [13]- [15]. Nonetheless, the SAR model developed in this work is based on EV traffic data for a single working day, due to the license limitations of the TomTom data collection portal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The adoption of EV energy consumption models for midemand modeling demonstrates a solution to the scarcity of microscopic EV traffic flow data. This enables the real-time prediction of EV charging requirements and facilitates effective charging coordination based on individual energy requirements, in contrast to real-time charger requirement modeling in [13]- [15]. Nonetheless, the SAR model developed in this work is based on EV traffic data for a single working day, due to the license limitations of the TomTom data collection portal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These datasets provide information about the starts and end times of charging, the durations of charging sessions, and the amount of energy delivered at predefined charging locations. This approach is adopted in [10], [11] and [12] using published charging datasets collected over long periods of time from different EV chargers, and in [13]- [15] using localized charging data to train machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models for real-time prediction of the EV electricity requirements at specific charging stations. These charging data-based models, however, fail to incorporate the spatial and temporal variations in driving patterns, traveling distances, and driving durations within its prediction model, as they are based on static charging data with no EV mobility considerations.…”
Section: A Demand Modeling Using Charger Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the seminal paper [48], the Federated Stochastic Gradient Descent (FedSGD) and Federated Averaging (FedAvg) algorithms were first proposed. A recent study [49] employed CNN and bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks as local models and implemented FedAvg for global optimization. The study revealed that the performance of the model improved compared to the original local model.…”
Section: Federated Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%