2016
DOI: 10.1017/beq.2016.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Board Gender Quotas: Exploring Ethical Tensions From A Multi-Theoretical Perspective

Abstract: This is the accepted version of the paper.This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Abstract: Despite 40 years of equal opportunities policies and more than two decades of government and organization initiatives aimed at helping women reach the upper echelons of the corporate world, women are seriously underrepresented on corporate boards. Recently, fifteen countries sought to redress this imbalance by introducing gender quotas for board representation. The introduction of bo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
180
0
9

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(193 citation statements)
references
References 213 publications
(253 reference statements)
4
180
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…This implies that charities with gender/ethnically diverse boards may not need to employ higher levels of leverage in order to monitor and encourage trustees to act in line with stakeholders' interests. Further, and from legitimisation perspective, board diversity can enhance organisation's reputation/image by increasing public accountability and confidence (Loukil & Yousfi, 2015;Ntim & Soobaroyen, 2013;Sila et al, 2016;Terjesen & Sealy, 2016). In contrast, TBD can increase managers' power and influence over board decisions by appointing a few women and ethnic minorities mainly for symbolic reasons (Estelyi & Nisar, 2016;Gyapong et al, 2016).…”
Section: Charity Tbd and Csmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that charities with gender/ethnically diverse boards may not need to employ higher levels of leverage in order to monitor and encourage trustees to act in line with stakeholders' interests. Further, and from legitimisation perspective, board diversity can enhance organisation's reputation/image by increasing public accountability and confidence (Loukil & Yousfi, 2015;Ntim & Soobaroyen, 2013;Sila et al, 2016;Terjesen & Sealy, 2016). In contrast, TBD can increase managers' power and influence over board decisions by appointing a few women and ethnic minorities mainly for symbolic reasons (Estelyi & Nisar, 2016;Gyapong et al, 2016).…”
Section: Charity Tbd and Csmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although initially debated (Bertrand et al 2014;Terjesen & Sealy 2016), mandatory board gender quotas have since been successfully implemented in Norway (Seierstad 2016 Some critics of gender-based legislation contend that gender diversity should rather be encouraged through 'softer' reforms such as voluntary targets (Seierstad 2016). …”
Section: Mandatory Board Gender Quotasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This creates the ideal of organizations as meritocracies, a social system where talent and merit alone dictate who receives advancements or rewards (Scully, 1997;Castilla and Benard, 2010) without influence from other factors such as gender. Resistance to quotas in particular might be fuelled by the perception that quotas threaten this meritocratic system (Noon, 2007), as in the case of the UK where the threat of quotas has motivated voluntary actions but where quotas remain unpopular (Terjesen and Sealy, 2016). This ideal of meritocracy implies that gender inequalities are instead attributed to essentialist beliefs about the traits and/or preferences of women and men rather than to a system in which systematic biases prevent equal opportunities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%