Board Interlocks and Initial Public Offering Performance in the United States and the United Kingdom: An Institutional Perspective

Abstract

Sun Yat-sen UniversityBuilding on the institutional perspective on capital markets, we examine the process of legitimation that underpins investor valuation of initial public offerings in the context of institutional polycentricism. We focus on the impact of board interlocks of the CEO and internal and external board members on investor perceptions of initial public offering firms in the United States and United Kingdom. We find that the extent of board members' interlocks relates positively to the extent of the CEO's interlocks, but this relationship is stronger in the United Kingdom than in the United States. More extensive interlocks lead to higher valuations in the United Kingdom than in the United States. This is the result of differences in institutional confluences that underpin corporate governance in the two culturally related countries.An initial public offering (IPO) is a critical stage in the life of a firm (Bruton, Chahine, & Filatotchev, 2009). To improve investors' perceptions of an IPO's value in the highly uncertain environment of new listings, firms seek to show that they meet investors'

The Complexity of Social Capital: The Influence of Board and Ownership Interlocks on Implied Cost of Capital in an Emerging Market

“…Recent studies showed that board size impacts financial variables as market value, risk, and ROA [38,54]. Also, it is a relevant characteristic of the board's structure [23,55].…”

Market Orientation, Growth Strategy, and Firm Performance: The Moderating Effects of External Connections

“…a last resort) driven by a lack of external financing, entrepreneurs also proactively use bootstrapping techniques (Grichnik, Brinckmann, Singh and Manigart, 2014;Winborg, 2009). Some 95% of firms in the studies by Freear, Sohl and Wetzel (1995) and Harrison, Mason and Girling (2004) were engaged in at least some bootstrapping activities. Despite its prevalence, research on financial bootstrapping remains scarce-even when we consider studies that have focused on some individual bootstrapping techniques, such as leasing and using subsidy financing (e.g.…”

“…Considering the importance of entrepreneurial firms for the overall economic system, there is a need for research on these distinct sources of financing, to understand how they impact startups (Fraser, Bhaumik and Wright, 2015) and how these new (or generally ignored) phenomena shape existing theories. Previous studies emphasized the peculiarity of the entrepreneurial settings to study mainstream theories such as agency theory (e.g.…”

Globalization of Capital Markets: Implications for Firm Strategies

“…Sociological and institutional perspectives on financial market behavior suggests an alternative theoretical approach to the role of macro-institutions by arguing that capital market reactions to firm-level financing strategies are institutionally embedded (Bell, et al, 2014;Zajac and Westphal, 2004). From this perspective, market perceptions of the firm's actions are an outcome of investors' perceptions of its legitimacy rather than rational, efficiency-centered investor decisions (Filatotchev, Chahine and Bruton, 2016). Legitimacy is the "generalized perception or assumption that the actions of an entity are desirable, proper, or appropriate, within some socially constructed system of norms, values, beliefs, and definitions" (Suchman, 1995: 574).…”

“…These arguments provide novel dimensions to the institutional perspective in IB research by suggesting that capital market strategies may be framed not only by underlying efficiency models but also by differences in cultural, macro-institutional factors that underpin institutional logics in different capital markets (Filatotchev et al, 2016) as indicated in Table 2. Grinblatt and Keloharju (2000) found that investors are more likely to hold, buy, and sell the stocks of firms that are located close to the investor, that communicate in the investor's native tongue, and have chief executives of the same cultural background.…”