Most corporate governance discussions center on traditional shareholder-manager problems or agency problem type I. These discussions typically assume that greater insider ownership leads to better corporate governance (Morck & Yeung, 2003) because managers who own large blocks of shares in their firms are less likely to take actions which reduce the value of their shares (Jensen & Meckling, 1976). This mitigation framework is certainly true in the most developed economies whereby ownership structures are very much diffuse (Morck & Yeung, 2003). However, this framework may not work in emerging markets where ownership structure is highly concentrated and most of them are family-controlled firms. The Review of Literature Corporate Governance Development and Regulatory Framework One of the major causes of post-1997 Asian financial crisis corporate governance was the reforms in the Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance (MCCG) which was established in 2000. The World Bank in its assessments on the observance of Corporate Governance codes in Malaysia since 2001 observed that Malaysia has faced several challenges in improving its corporate governance practices due to its institutional setting. It was highlighted that the government's level of equity ownership has remained large, whilst free float has remained low and directors' accountability and protection for minority shareholders were significantly low. Furthermore, the role of institutional investors and shareholder activism in the corporate governance framework were weak. According to World Bank reports during 2001 and 2005, the corporate governance landscape in Malaysia transformed significantly as firms enhanced their corporate governance systems. These initiatives made a difference when Malaysian firms with concentrated ownership produced better accounting results (Haniffa & Hudaib, 2006). After outlining the reports of World Bank in 2005 on the inadequacies of the corporate governance reforms, the code was revised in 2007. The Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance 2007 (MCCG 2007) emphasized on strengthening the board of directors and audit committees and ensuring that the board of directors and audit committees discharge their duties and responsibilities effectively. To sustain the corporate governance climate, the Securities Commission (SC) published the Corporate Governance Blueprint 2011 in 2011. This blueprint further focuses on the exercise of shareholder rights, role of institutional investors, board's role in governance, improving disclosure and transparency, role of gatekeepers and influencers, as well as public and private enforcement. To spearhead the Corporate Governance Blueprint 2011, the Securities Commission further revised the MCCG 2007 in 2012. The MCCG 2012 which supersedes the 2007 code, sets out principles, structures, and processes for companies' board so that the board could incorporate good corporate governance into their firms' business dealings and corporate culture. Despite the issuance of the MCCG in 2000, 2007, and 2012, these code...