Body Mass Index, Demographic and Socioeconomic Risk, and Protective Factors of Type 2 Diabetes Among Six Groups of Foreign-Born Asian Americans

Tran, Thanh V.; Nguyen, Thuc‐Nhi; Chan, Keith

doi:10.1080/01488376.2014.919822

“…Park et al, 2014), body image and eating disorders ( n = 6; Chang, Yu, & Kahle, 2014; H.-L. Cheng, 2014; de Guzman & Nishina, 2014; Kelly, Cotter, Tanofsky-Kraff, & Mazzeo, 2014; Masuda, Le, & Cohen, 2014; Smart & Tsong, 2014), and diabetes ( n = 4; Inouye, Matsuura, Li, Castro, & Leake, 2014; Qiao et al, 2014; T. Tran, Allen, Nguyen, Lee, & Chan, 2014; T. V. Tran, T.-N. Nguyen, & K. Chan, 2014).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Park et al, 2014), body image and eating disorders ( n = 6; Chang, Yu, & Kahle, 2014; H.-L. Cheng, 2014; de Guzman & Nishina, 2014; Kelly, Cotter, Tanofsky-Kraff, & Mazzeo, 2015; Masuda, Le, & Cohen, 2014; Smart & Tsong, 2014), and diabetes ( n = 4; Inouye, Matsuura, Li, Castro, & Leake, 2014; Qiao et al, 2014; T. Tran, Allen, Nguyen, Lee, & Chan, 2014; Tran, Nguyen, & Chan, 2014b). Eating and weight-related issues emerged as important health issues in different developmental periods throughout the entire life span: from maternal feeding and child nutrition (Cachelin et al, 2014; H.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Annual review of Asian American Psychology, 2014.

Kim¹,

Shen²,

Hou³

et al. 2015

Asian American Journal of Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This 2014 review of Asian American psychology is the sixth review in the series. It includes 316 articles that met the inclusion criteria established by the past five annual reviews. Featured articles were derived from three sources: 137 were generated via the search term “Asian American” in PyscINFO, 111 were generated via a search for specific Asian American ethnic groups, and 32 were generated via author searches of articles that met the inclusion criteria. The top primary topic was health and health-related behaviors, the most frequently employed study design was cross-sectional, and the most studied Asian American ethnic group was Chinese. This year’s review includes information on the target population of the primary topic, the age range and developmental period of participants, and whether the study design was cross-sectional or longitudinal. It also identifies top authors and journals contributing to the 2014 annual review. These new features reveal that the most common target population of the primary topic was youths; studies most commonly included emerging adults ages 18–25; cross-sectional study design was employed more often than longitudinal design; the top contributor to the 2014 review was Stephen Chen, who authored the highest number of papers included; and the Asian American Journal of Psychology generated the highest number of publications for this review.

show abstract

“…Wang, Q. Chen, et al, 2014) -and various outcomes such as socioemotional and behavioral well-being (Y. Murray et al, 2014), health (Shin & Lach, 2014; T. V. Tran, T.-N. Nguyen, & K. T. Chan, 2014), academic outcomes (S. Y. Kim, Y. Wang, Q. Chen, et al, 2014), and consumer behaviors (Ha, Hums, & Greenwell, 2014;Jun, Ham, & Park, 2014;Weber et al, 2014).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Annual review of Asian American Psychology, 2013.

Wei¹,

Carrera²,

Li³

2014

Asian American Journal of Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This 2014 review of Asian American psychology is the sixth review in the series. It includes 316 articles that met the inclusion criteria established by the past five annual reviews. Featured articles were derived from three sources: 137 were generated via the search term "Asian American" in PyscINFO, 111 were generated via a search for specific Asian American ethnic groups, and 32 were generated via author searches of articles that met the inclusion criteria. The top primary topic was health and health-related behaviors, the most frequently employed study design was crosssectional, and the most studied Asian American ethnic group was Chinese. This year's review includes information on the target population of the primary topic, the age range and developmental period of participants, and whether the study design was cross-sectional or longitudinal. It also identifies top authors and journals contributing to the 2014 annual review. These new features reveal that the most common target population of the primary topic was Correspondence concerning this article should be sent to Su Yeong Kim, Department of Human Development and Family Sciences, 108 E Dean Keeton St., Stop A2702, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712. su.yeong.kim@utexas.edu. HHS Public Access Author manuscriptAsian Am J Psychol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 December 01. Published in final edited form as:Asian Am J Psychol. 2015 December ; 6(4): 291-332. doi:10.1037/aap0000031. Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript youths; studies most commonly included emerging adults ages 18-25; cross-sectional study design was employed more often than longitudinal design; the top contributor to the 2014 review was Stephen Chen, who authored the highest number of papers included; and the Asian American Journal of Psychology generated the highest number of publications for this review. Keywords review; Asian Americans, 2014The annual review of Asian American psychology facilitates a comprehensive, year-to-year understanding of the field by summarizing the major research topics and methodology used in Asian American psychology. Comparison of multiple annual reviews reveals past, current, and emerging trends. Illuminating these trends can be informative for new and experienced scholars alike, who can utilize the reviews to synthesize past and current research. This will help them identify emerging trends in order to plan future research that will make a meaningful contribution to scholarship on Asian American psychology. The present annual review uses the format established by the past five annual reviews, with the addition of new features for future annual reviews to consider. Like past reviews, the current issue presents major trends by primary topic, methodological design, and participant characteristics (e.g., average age and ethnicity). This review contributes a developmental perspective by including age range and developmental period in our categorization of participants, and by considering cross-...

show abstract