2000
DOI: 10.1017/s0958067000019321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Body position and cardiac dynamic and chronotropic responses to steady-state isocapnic hypoxaemia in humans

Abstract: Neural mediation of the human cardiac response to isocapnic (IC) steady-state hypoxaemia was investigated using coarse-graining spectral analysis of heart rate variability (HRV). Six young adults were exposed in random order to a hypoxia or control protocol, in supine and sitting postures, while end-tidal PCOµ (PET,COµ) was clamped at resting eucapnic levels. An initial 11 min period of euoxia ( PET,Oµ 100 mmHg; 13.3 kPa) was followed by a 22 min exposure to hypoxia ( PET,Oµ 55 mmHg; 7.3 kPa), or continued euo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Anchisi et al (2001) found a linear relationship between SaO 2 and _ Q" vO 2 ; which we interpret as applying to a condition of predominant sympathetic activation. This postulate relies on the following notions: (1) a resting human in normoxia is characterised by elevated vagal stimulation that is withdrawn at exercise start (Robinson et al 1966;Fagraeus and Linnarsson 1976;Malliani et al 1991); (2) the _ Q" vO 2 values observed by Anchisi et al (2001) in resting humans in normoxia fall well below the described SaO 2 vs _ Q" vO 2 line, and are significantly lower than the invariant _ Q" vO 2 values observed at exercise in normoxia in the same study; (3) acute hypoxia depresses vagal activation (Yamamoto et al 1996;Lucy et al 2000;Halliwill and Minson 2002) and increases sympathetic activation (Xie et al 2001); and (4) the _ Q" vO 2 values observed by Anchisi et al (2001) in resting humans in hypoxia lie on the described _ Q" vO 2 vs SaO 2 line. A direct consequence of this postulate is the hypothesis that selective blockade of heart b1-adrenergic receptors would reduce _ QaO 2 and _ Q" vO 2 in humans at given submaximal steady state workloads, and thus change the relationship between _ Q" vO 2 and SaO 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Anchisi et al (2001) found a linear relationship between SaO 2 and _ Q" vO 2 ; which we interpret as applying to a condition of predominant sympathetic activation. This postulate relies on the following notions: (1) a resting human in normoxia is characterised by elevated vagal stimulation that is withdrawn at exercise start (Robinson et al 1966;Fagraeus and Linnarsson 1976;Malliani et al 1991); (2) the _ Q" vO 2 values observed by Anchisi et al (2001) in resting humans in normoxia fall well below the described SaO 2 vs _ Q" vO 2 line, and are significantly lower than the invariant _ Q" vO 2 values observed at exercise in normoxia in the same study; (3) acute hypoxia depresses vagal activation (Yamamoto et al 1996;Lucy et al 2000;Halliwill and Minson 2002) and increases sympathetic activation (Xie et al 2001); and (4) the _ Q" vO 2 values observed by Anchisi et al (2001) in resting humans in hypoxia lie on the described _ Q" vO 2 vs SaO 2 line. A direct consequence of this postulate is the hypothesis that selective blockade of heart b1-adrenergic receptors would reduce _ QaO 2 and _ Q" vO 2 in humans at given submaximal steady state workloads, and thus change the relationship between _ Q" vO 2 and SaO 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Another approach was used by Lucy, Hughson, Kowalchuk, Paterson, and Cunningham (2000), who used HR variability analysis to identify autonomic changes during steady-state isocapnic hypoxia in humans and found decreased vagal tone during the exposure. However, it may be only hypothesized that vagal withdrawal is secondary to the stimulation of lung mechanoreceptors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, acute effects of hypoxia were not clear. Several studies have examined that in subjects staying at the hypoxic chamber [17][18][19] , where oxygen contents were low. However, these studies failed to detect the relation between hypoxia and RR-interval fluctuations.…”
Section: Hypoxia and Rr-interval Fluctuationsmentioning
confidence: 99%