1996
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3697(96)00319-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bond arrangement and optical band gap in GexAs40 − xS(Se)60 glasses and thin films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is clear that Sb-S contributions to the total g͑r͒ dominate in the Ge x Sb 40−x S 60 glasses with high Sb content, whereas contribution from Ge-Sb correlations increases as the Ge content becomes larger. This experimental finding regarding Ge-Sb correlations agrees well with bond statistics within random bond network model 25,26 and actually with Feltz's 12 suggestion about the existence of As 2 Ge structural units and/or Ge-As bonds in Ge x As 40−x S 60 ternaries for compositions with x Ͼ 30. This means that in the alloys studied, random bonding is dominant in comparison with the ordered bond network model 25,26 in the framework of which the weakest bonds such as Ge-Sb͑As͒ in GeSb͑As͒-S systems do not contribute to the bond fractions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…It is clear that Sb-S contributions to the total g͑r͒ dominate in the Ge x Sb 40−x S 60 glasses with high Sb content, whereas contribution from Ge-Sb correlations increases as the Ge content becomes larger. This experimental finding regarding Ge-Sb correlations agrees well with bond statistics within random bond network model 25,26 and actually with Feltz's 12 suggestion about the existence of As 2 Ge structural units and/or Ge-As bonds in Ge x As 40−x S 60 ternaries for compositions with x Ͼ 30. This means that in the alloys studied, random bonding is dominant in comparison with the ordered bond network model 25,26 in the framework of which the weakest bonds such as Ge-Sb͑As͒ in GeSb͑As͒-S systems do not contribute to the bond fractions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…We can see also from Tables 1 and 2 that the spectral position of χ max correlates with the change of the band gap E g of the investigated glasses [11].…”
Section: Eevmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…This behavior can be well explained by adopting that both As-and Ge-related atomic sub-systems (As-based AsS 3/2 pyramids and Ge-based GeS 4/2 tetrahedra) are sensitive to radiation influence, while Sb-related subsystem leads only to a weakening in radiation-induced changes observed in vitreous germanium sulphides owing to extremely high metalisation level of corresponding covalent chemical bonds within SbS 3/2 pyramids [14]. Therefore, the observed compositional dependence in g 0 parameter for stoichiometric ChG is determined mainly by effectiveness of radiationinduced defect formation within each atomic sub-system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The homopolar bonds in bulk stoichiometric ChG obtained with melt quenching are possible only in under-margin concentrations, being more character for thermally deposited ChG-based thin films [5]. A small amount of Geenriched Ge 2 S 6/2 structural groups with homopolar Ge-Ge covalent bonds appear only in non-stoichiometric As 2 S 3 -Ge 2 S 3 compositions at high Z (Z > 2.7), while Ge-As covalent bonds are of negligible probability in this system [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation