1972
DOI: 10.4141/cjas72-005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bone Growth and Distribution in Swine as Influenced by Liveweight, Breed, Sex, and Ration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
17
1
1

Year Published

1978
1978
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
6
17
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…McMeekan (1940) and Richmond and Berg (1972) using pigs, and Seebeck (1973) Seebeck (1913) and Berg et al (1979) indicated that these bones had growth coefficients significantly greater than 1.0 with the lumbar region being the latest maturing in agreement with the growth gradient theory of Hammond (1932). However, Seebeck (1973) and Berg etal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…McMeekan (1940) and Richmond and Berg (1972) using pigs, and Seebeck (1973) Seebeck (1913) and Berg et al (1979) indicated that these bones had growth coefficients significantly greater than 1.0 with the lumbar region being the latest maturing in agreement with the growth gradient theory of Hammond (1932). However, Seebeck (1973) and Berg etal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…It is likely that this results in increased mechanical loads to the bones as, in growing pigs, body weight increases relatively faster than bone mass and bone cross-sectional area. 20 The trabeculae align at a later stage, when the increase in weight, hence in the loads, is slower compared with the early growth stage. This suggests that, in the early growth stage, when the trabecular architecture is not yet optimally adapted to external loads, mechanical adaptation is achieved through increased bone mass, and that the trabecular architecture is more efficient in later years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, (a) the increase in bone volume fraction (density) is the determinant feature of growing bone (43), and (b) the weights of the bones increase faster with age during fetal development than do the volumes while percentage ash weights of the fetal skeletons show only a slight but significant increase with age (38). Finally, the hypothesis that QUS simply detects bone size differences can be rejected by considering that (a) body weight increases relatively faster than bone cross-sectional area (44), (b) studies in bones from pigs show no dependency of SOS from the thickness of cortical or trabecular bone slices (45), and (c) ultrasound velocity is largely dependent upon bone density rather than bone width (46,47). Finally, microarchitectural (structural property) deterioration cannot be taken into account to explain the reduced ultrasonic transmission, as suggested by some (48) and questioned by others (49), because architectural adaptation in growing bone follows the increase in bone volume fraction (43) and is not activated at this early state of development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%