Bone Healing with or without Platelet‐Rich Plasma around Four Different Dental Implant Surfaces in Beagle Dogs

Streckbein, Philipp; Kleis, Wilfried K G; Buch, R. S. R.; Hansen, Torsten; Weibrich, Gernot

doi:10.1111/cid.12026

Cited by 24 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In fact, some studies could not demonstrate any advantages of PRP over control groups not using PRP regarding the promotion of a faster bone formation or a higher boneimplant contact. [43][44][45] By contrast, significantly higher percentage of bone-implant contact were reported in implants coated with liquid PRP compared to those not PRP-bioactivated through histomorphometric analysis after 6-8 weeks following implant insertion. 28,46,47 Furthermore, a layer of liquid-PRP sprayed onto the implant surface before insertion showed a tendency to increase the bone apposition to roughened titanium implants during early healing phase.…”

Section: Tablementioning

confidence: 91%

Short dental implants as compared to maxillary sinus augmentation procedure for the rehabilitation of edentulous posterior maxilla: Three‐year results of a randomized clinical study

Taschieri

Lolato

Testori

et al. 2017

Clin Implant Dent Rel Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Several treatment options exist for the implant-supported rehabilitation of edentulous posterior maxilla.Purpose: To compare maxillary sinus floor augmentation associated to standard length implants, with direct placement of implants of reduced length in the available residual bone. Materials and Methods:Patients with edentulous posterior maxilla and a residual height of 4-7 mm were randomly allocated to the test (short implants [SIs], 6.5 to 8.5mm long) or the control (sinus augmentation [SA] and implants 10mm long) group. Anorganic bovine bone was the grafting material for the control group. In both groups pure platelet-rich plasma was used to bioactivate implant surface prior to insertion. Implant and prosthesis survival, clinical variables, radiographic bone level change, quality of life, and patient satisfaction were assessed.Results: Twenty-five patients were treated in the control group (58 standard length implants) and 27 in the test group (42 SIs). After 3 years of follow-up no implant failure and biological or mechanical complications were recorded. Marginal bone loss, soft tissue, and oral hygiene parameters were similar in the 2 groups at both 1 and 3 years' follow-up. Postoperative pain, swelling and other symptoms and daily activities were better in the SIs group than in the SA group, while patients' satisfaction after 1 year was similar.Conclusions: In spite of comparable medium-term clinical and radiographic outcomes, when the residual ridge height is sufficient for a safe placement, SIs may be preferred due to simplified protocol, less invasiveness, shorter treatment time, and reduced postoperative discomfort as compared to SA.

show abstract

Section: Tablementioning

confidence: 91%

Short dental implants as compared to maxillary sinus augmentation procedure for the rehabilitation of edentulous posterior maxilla: Three‐year results of a randomized clinical study

Taschieri

Lolato

Testori

et al. 2017

Clin Implant Dent Rel Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The regenerative potential of platelet‐rich plasma (PRP) has been explored considerably during the past two decades 6‐10 . The primary goal of using PRP in periodontal therapy is to regenerate lost periodontal tissues during the progression of the periodontal diseases.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Antimicrobial Activity of Platelet‐Rich Plasma and Other Plasma Preparations Against Periodontal Pathogens

Yang

Yan

et al. 2015

Journal of Periodontology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As it is claimed that platelet concentrates may promote bone regeneration, several animal studies have been conducted to assess the PRP effect on the osseointegration process, through histological and histomorphometrical evaluation, but controversial results have been reported. In fact, some studies did not demonstrate any advantages of PRP over non-PRP control groups at stimulating faster bone formation or higher bone-implant contact [47][48][49]. By contrast, histomorphometric analyses of the bone-implant interface in the early healing phase after implantation (6 or 8 weeks) revealed a significantly higher percentage of boneimplant contact in implants coated with liquid PRP formulation compared to those not PRPbioactivated [50][51][52].…”

Section: Implant Dentistrymentioning

confidence: 99%

Tissue Engineering: Use of Growth Factors in Bone Regeneration

Mortellaro¹,

Fabbro²

2018

Biomaterials in Regenerative Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Tissue healing is a complex process involving a cascade of cellular and molecular events that are mostly shared by the different tissues of the body. Interestingly, the tissue repair process initiates immediately after a traumatic injury and is mediated and controlled by a wide range of cytokines, proteins, and growth factors released from platelets upon activation. Consequently, many growth factors have been considered as therapeutic molecules for the repair or regeneration of a wide range of tissues. Although their role has been only partially elucidated, the potential benefit of most growth factors has been demonstrated. In the last few years, the development of platelet-rich preparations has revolutionized the field of regenerative medicine, due to the repair capacities of the platelet-released growth factors that stimulate and accelerate both soft and hard tissue healing and regeneration. Today, autologous platelet concentrates (APCs) are used in a wide range of disciplines such as dentistry, oral surgery, orthopedics, sport medicine, dermatology, and plastic and reconstructive surgery. The purpose of this chapter is to describe the current evidence regarding the benefits of using autologous platelet concentrates in various oral surgery procedures, using a systematic review approach.

show abstract

Bone Healing with or without Platelet‐Rich Plasma around Four Different Dental Implant Surfaces in Beagle Dogs

Abstract: This study found no significant differences in the BICR for roughened implant surfaces compared with machined surfaces. In this animal model, the addition of PRP did not demonstrate evidence of faster bone formation or the resulting BICR.

Cited by 24 publications

References 20 publications

Short dental implants as compared to maxillary sinus augmentation procedure for the rehabilitation of edentulous posterior maxilla: Three‐year results of a randomized clinical study

Short dental implants as compared to maxillary sinus augmentation procedure for the rehabilitation of edentulous posterior maxilla: Three‐year results of a randomized clinical study

Antimicrobial Activity of Platelet‐Rich Plasma and Other Plasma Preparations Against Periodontal Pathogens

Tissue Engineering: Use of Growth Factors in Bone Regeneration

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About