No abstract

From 1988 to 1991, 17 patients with malignant periacetabular tumors underwent limbsparing surgery and reconstruction using the saddle prosthesis. There were 8 patients with primary malignant lesions (Group l), and 9 patients with metastatic or systemic tumor involving the periacetabular pelvis (Group 2). All resections included excision of the acetabulum. Patients ranged in age from 24 to 76 years (average, 59.8 years). Local control was achieved in all patients. Wide margins were obtained in all patients with primary pelvic tumors. Functional outcomes were rated as follows excellent (lo), good (2), fair (l), and poor (4). Three patients, all of whom had pul-

Platelet concentrates (PC) are increasingly used to increase bone regeneration in pre-prosthetic surgery. Although it is generally appreciated that certain growth factors (PDGF, TGF, EGF, and ECGF) are present in thrombocyte preparations, relatively little is known about these components in quantitative terms. The study reported here analysed the amounts of growth factors in PC produced under standard conditions from healthy volunteers. All the blood samples (237 in total) were analysed using Quantikine ELISA kits (R and D). The mean +/- SD platelet count in whole blood from these donors was 262,000+/-58,000/microl, while in PC produced by discontinuous cell separation it was 1.419,000+/-333,000/microl. The mean growth factor concentrations in PC preparations in ng/ml were as follows: PDGF-AB 125+/-55 ng/ml; TGF-beta1 221+/-92 ng/ml; IGF-I 85+/-25 ng/ml; PDGF-BB 14+/-9 ng/ml; TGF-beta2 0.4+/-0.3 ng/ml. These growth factor concentrations typically covered a 3-10 fold range: PDGF-AB 29-277ng/ml; PDGF-BB 2-33ng/ml; TGF-beta1 32-397ng/ml; TGF-beta2 0.1-1.2 ng/ml; IGF-I 40-138 ng/ml. Platelet counts in PC were slightly higher for women (Mann-Whitney Test all p < 0.001) than for men, while the concentrations of growth factors in PC exhibited no gender-related difference of any statistical significance.

An important reason to improve methods for isolating platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is the potential use of autogenous platelet growth factors. In addition to the Curasan PRP kit (Curasan, Kleinostheim, Germany) and the platelet concentrated collection system (PCCSTM) system, two new methods for the preparation of PRP by the surgeon are now available. This study compared the suitability of these new methods for the preparation of PRP. Whole blood was drawn from 54 healthy donors (33 men and 21 women) aged 23-79 years (38.0 +/- 17.7 years). PRP was prepared from each donor's blood using both the Smart PRePTM system (Harvest Technologies Corporation, Munich, Germany) and the Friadent-Schütze method (PRP kit; Friadent-Schütze, Vienna, Austria). The platelet count in donor whole blood was 276 810 +/- 59 440 /microl. Platelet counts differed significantly between the Smart PRP preparation (1227 890 +/- 312 440 platelets/microl) and the Friadent-Schütze PRP preparation (1440 500 +/- 501 700 platelets/microl) (sign test, P < 0.001). The Smart PRePTM system had a significantly higher collection efficiency (63.4 +/- 7.9%) than the Friadent-Schütze kit (49.6 +/- 13.6%) (sign test, P < 0.001). The leukocyte contents in the two platelet concentrates were similar (Smart PRePTM, 19 261 +/- 8082 platelets/microl; Friadent-Schütze, 21 691 +/- 16 430). Transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta1 and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-AB were higher in the Friadent-Schütze PRP (TGF-beta1, 196.8 +/- 109.6 ng/ml; PDGF-AB, 251.6 +/- 115.4 ng/ml) than in the Smart PRePTM (TGF-beta1, 77.2 +/- 54.8 ng/ml; PDGF-AB, 208 +/- 85.2 ng/ml). The sign test indicated significant differences between the two methods in the concentrations of TGF-beta1 (P < 0.001) and PDGF-AB (P < 0.01). Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 levels in the two PRP preparations were similar (Friadent-Schütze PRP, 72.8 +/- 22.3 ng/ml; Smart PRePTM, 91.4 +/- 21.3 ng/ml). The Smart PRePTM system was superior with respect to ease of handling and preparation time. It also had a significantly higher platelet collection efficiency than the Friadent-Schütze PRePTM kit. The Friadent-Schütze PRP kit offers a slight advantage in the resulting PRP platelet concentration. However, this is easily compensated for in the Smart PRePTM system by reducing the volume of the resulting PRP.

This study found no significant differences in the BICR for roughened implant surfaces compared with machined surfaces. In this animal model, the addition of PRP did not demonstrate evidence of faster bone formation or the resulting BICR.