1979
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.820130510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bone ingrowth and stress shielding with a porous surface coated fracture fixation plate

Abstract: The extent of bone remodelling under metal fixation plates attached to bone by (i) normal screw fixation and (ii) bone ingrowth into a porous metallic surface underlayer sintered to the metal plate was investigated. Extensive bone remodelling was observed under the integrally bonded porous surface layered plate. This remodelling could be attributed to the more extensive stress transfer from bone to metal plate because of the good bone-to-implant bonding. The importance of stress shielding with high stiffness i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
45
0
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible explanation for this observation could be the increased stress-shielding occurring at the implant-tissue interface in response to WBV. These stress concentrations may have evoked increased bone resorption at the implant neck [49]. Noteworthy mentioning and in agreement with the findings of a μCT imaging study assessing the bone micro-architecture in se relative to the hormonal and mechanical status [25], the association of pharmacological (ALN) with mechanical treatment (HF WBV) did not lead to a synergistic reaction influencing the bone healing response at any level (cortical/medullar) or region (implant surface, implant interfacial, and remote zone).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible explanation for this observation could be the increased stress-shielding occurring at the implant-tissue interface in response to WBV. These stress concentrations may have evoked increased bone resorption at the implant neck [49]. Noteworthy mentioning and in agreement with the findings of a μCT imaging study assessing the bone micro-architecture in se relative to the hormonal and mechanical status [25], the association of pharmacological (ALN) with mechanical treatment (HF WBV) did not lead to a synergistic reaction influencing the bone healing response at any level (cortical/medullar) or region (implant surface, implant interfacial, and remote zone).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another consideration is the modulus of elasticity mismatch between α + β Ti alloys, which is approximately between 110 GPa and 115 GPa, and cortical bone, which is approximately 30 GPa [11,30]. The stiffer implant carries the load rather than the bone, which atrophies and loses density (osteopenia) due to lack of functional stimulation in a process known as stress shielding [77]. This process may in turn lead to fractures or loosening of the implant.…”
Section: Biomedical Implantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Young s modulus of Ti-64 ELI, although lower than those of steels and Co-Cr-Mo alloys 1) , is 110 GPa; that of cortical human bone is only 10-30 GPa 9) . Such a mismatch can cause stress shielding effects 10) , which prevent loads that are essential for the health of the bone tissue, leading to bone resorption and a decrease in the quality of the bone around the implant 3,11) . In recent years, increased efforts have been directed at producing more biocompatible Ti alloys 2) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%