2017
DOI: 10.2110/palo.2016.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bone Loss From Carcasses in Mediterranean Ecosystems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Eloísa Bernáldez Sánchez and co-workers sampled carcasses in Doñana National Park between 1988 and 1991 with the aim of understanding the patterns that lead to carcass degradation and the influence of factors such as body size, time elapsed since death, and vegetation coverage [38,39]. They restricted their study to the Doñana Biological Reserve, a relatively small area (6,900 ha) within DNP, lacking some major habitats of the park (e.g., beach and river margin).…”
Section: Previous Taphonomic Work At Doñana National Parkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Eloísa Bernáldez Sánchez and co-workers sampled carcasses in Doñana National Park between 1988 and 1991 with the aim of understanding the patterns that lead to carcass degradation and the influence of factors such as body size, time elapsed since death, and vegetation coverage [38,39]. They restricted their study to the Doñana Biological Reserve, a relatively small area (6,900 ha) within DNP, lacking some major habitats of the park (e.g., beach and river margin).…”
Section: Previous Taphonomic Work At Doñana National Parkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By mainly focusing on the monitoring of complete or nearly complete carcasses, their studies differed methodologically from ours (i.e., we have also analyzed many isolated bones). The main variables that they recorded were measures of skeletal disarticulation, bone dispersal, and bone loss [38,39], whereas our observations include a larger set of taphonomic variables and surveys over the full suite of DNP habitats. We consider therefore that their study and our study are not redundant but complementary.…”
Section: Previous Taphonomic Work At Doñana National Parkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of biostratinomic and diagenetic processes in current ecosystems is useful to understand taphocoenosis (Andrews 1995;Bernáldez-Sánchez et al 2017;Denys 2002;Domínguez-Rodrigo 1998;. There are a number of papers about the diagenesis of bones (Behrensmeyer 1978;Bernáldez-Sánchez 2011;Domínguez-Solera and Domínguez-Rodrigo 2009;Yravedra 2006), some of them related to aquatic ecosystems (Anderson and Bell 2014;Arnaud et al 1978 Fernández-Jalvo and Andrews 2003;Pokines and Higgs 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taphonomic pathways are multiple and diverse, comprising all of the processes that alter individual bones as well as entire archaeological and paleontological assemblages, from the time of an animal’s death to the point of analysis. Similarly, these processes can alter assemblages in diverse ways (Clark et al 1967; Brain 1983; Andrews 1990; Behrensmeyer et al 1992; Lyman 1994; Bernáldez-Sánchez 2011; Bernáldez-Sánchez et al 2017) during both formation and subsequent excavation and recovery. Cave sites may filter body size, especially if cave openings are small.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%