2022
DOI: 10.1002/jha2.621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bone marrow necrosis and fat embolism syndrome in sickle cell disease during COVID‐19 infection treated successfully with sequential red cell and plasma exchange

Abstract: Fat embolism syndrome (FES) is a rare life‐threatening condition that is particularly seen in milder forms of sickle cell disease (SCD). Widespread systemic fat emboli are generated in the context of extensive bone marrow necrosis. Multi‐organ failure with a high morbidity and mortality may quickly develop. Infection with Parvovirus B19 is a common precipitant. Here, the authors report the case of a 35‐year‐old Afro‐Caribbean man with HbSC disease who presented with FES having tested positive for SA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Distinguishing between the two diagnoses can be more complex in the setting of hemoglobinopathy due to chronic hemolysis. FES can rarely cause a triad of neurological impairment, thrombocytopenia, and organ failure making presentation nearly identical to TTP [ 13 , 14 ]. Respiratory distress appears to be a distinguishing feature between the two as it is more common in FES; however, as demonstrated with our patient, relying on clinical presentation can be deceiving in these cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distinguishing between the two diagnoses can be more complex in the setting of hemoglobinopathy due to chronic hemolysis. FES can rarely cause a triad of neurological impairment, thrombocytopenia, and organ failure making presentation nearly identical to TTP [ 13 , 14 ]. Respiratory distress appears to be a distinguishing feature between the two as it is more common in FES; however, as demonstrated with our patient, relying on clinical presentation can be deceiving in these cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%