2010
DOI: 10.3923/javaa.2010.1588.1596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bone Marrow Seeded Bone Graft Versus Bone Graft; Compact Bone Critical Sized Defect Healing Pattern in Rabbit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In group C, intense new bone formation was found in the edge of defect area as compared to group B, where the osteogenesis was noticed in the middle of defect. This results correlated with the work of Kaveh (2010), in which they found that bone marrow seeded corticocancellous graft showed osteogenesis at the centre of graft, as compared to non seeded graft. Another study also suggested that bone synthesis in the middle region of implant was more pronounced in osteoblast containing processed bovine cancellous matrix in comparison to acellular (Kneser et al, 2006).…”
Section: Histological Observationssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In group C, intense new bone formation was found in the edge of defect area as compared to group B, where the osteogenesis was noticed in the middle of defect. This results correlated with the work of Kaveh (2010), in which they found that bone marrow seeded corticocancellous graft showed osteogenesis at the centre of graft, as compared to non seeded graft. Another study also suggested that bone synthesis in the middle region of implant was more pronounced in osteoblast containing processed bovine cancellous matrix in comparison to acellular (Kneser et al, 2006).…”
Section: Histological Observationssupporting
confidence: 88%