2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.01.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bone regeneration capacity of magnesium phosphate cements in a large animal model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
89
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
6
89
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A fast initial ingrowth of vivid bone cells into the medullary cavity resulted in a complete regeneration of the femur corticalis within the drill hole region after 12 weeks. Similar results have already been presented for MPCs in an ovine femoral defect model, where struvite cements displayed almost complete degradation after 10 months accompanied by new bone formation [7]. MPCs have also been subject to studies in rodents, where 3D printed scaffolds were implanted in a rat calvaria defect model leading to enhanced bone regeneration, even with partially increased bone volume [31].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A fast initial ingrowth of vivid bone cells into the medullary cavity resulted in a complete regeneration of the femur corticalis within the drill hole region after 12 weeks. Similar results have already been presented for MPCs in an ovine femoral defect model, where struvite cements displayed almost complete degradation after 10 months accompanied by new bone formation [7]. MPCs have also been subject to studies in rodents, where 3D printed scaffolds were implanted in a rat calvaria defect model leading to enhanced bone regeneration, even with partially increased bone volume [31].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…This assumption is based on the higher solubility and biocompatibility of MgP minerals under in vivo conditions [3], which should lead to faster resorption and bone remodeling stimulated by released magnesium ions [4]. This behavior was proofed in a number of animal studies with models ranging from small defects in rabbits [5,6] up to partial load-bearing tibial defects in sheep [7]. Additionally, magnesium phosphate cements (MPC) turned out to show very good biomechanical features, which are even better than clinically well-established calcium phosphate bone fillers [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cements often used in clinical contexts are the brushite cement (CaHPO 4 ·2H 2 O) ChronOS TM Inject and the apatite cement Graftys ® Quickset. ChronOS TM inject is known to have a good degradation rate (within 18 months, manufacturer information) without a lack of strength in this time [6] and the struvite cement has been demonstrated to show quantitative bone remodeling in an large animal model within ten months for both unloaded and load-bearing defects [22,23]. Such struvite cements provide a high initial strength of up to 80 MPa under compression [22], while ChronOS™ inject is mechanically much weaker with a compressive strength of <1 MPa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnesium phosphate cements (MPCs) are cementitious materials that are formed through a solution acid-based reaction between dead burnt magnesia and phosphate. Retarder and mineral admixtures may be added during hydration reaction to achieve proper workability or specific properties [8][9][10]. Formed at ambient temperatures and exhibiting properties like ceramics, MPCs are also termed chemically bonded phosphate ceramics [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%