1994
DOI: 10.1016/s0377-1237(17)31029-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bone Response to Stainless Steel and Titanium Bone Plates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to this study, it can be stated that SLM AISI 316L material would be more suitable for the construction of long term implants where strong bonding to hard tissues is required. On the other hand, "standard" AISI 316L may be used for the manufacturing of short term implants, as there is mostly only soft fibrillar tissue bonded to its surface [79]. Increased surface wettability is also connected to accelerated adhesion of blood proteins, which is linked with the initial stage of the tissue healing process [80].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this study, it can be stated that SLM AISI 316L material would be more suitable for the construction of long term implants where strong bonding to hard tissues is required. On the other hand, "standard" AISI 316L may be used for the manufacturing of short term implants, as there is mostly only soft fibrillar tissue bonded to its surface [79]. Increased surface wettability is also connected to accelerated adhesion of blood proteins, which is linked with the initial stage of the tissue healing process [80].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researches are going on to develop a technique using fl ow cytometry, for the purpose of detecting the activation of lymphocytes stimulated by a metal, and measuring different mediators (cytokines, infl ammatory mediators) released in response to the metal. Sahoo et al in his experiments found that there was osteoid tissue deposition around titanium which was a unique property lacking in stainless steel 26 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could leads to reduction in long term performance of the implant. 20 316 L stainless orthopedic implant provides ease in the removal of implant from the body as compared to titanium implant and prolong use of stainless steel implants are not recommended. 20…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%