2007
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.31311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bone tissue engineering using human adipose‐derived stem cells and honeycomb collagen scaffold

Abstract: Human adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) have the capacity to regenerate and the potential to differentiate into multiple lineages of mesenchymal cells. The aim of this study was to investigate the possibility of using honeycomb collagen scaffold to culture ASCs in bone tissue engineering. The osteogenic capacity of ASCs in vitro, was confirmed by histology and measuring the expression of cbfa-1. After that, ASCs were cultured for up to 14 days in the honeycomb scaffold to allow a high density, three-dimensiona… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
57
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hattori and colleagues describe better osteoconductivity on a β-TCP scaffold for ASCs, as compared with scaffolds of hydroxyapatite (HA) and atelocollagen honeycomb scaffolds (Hattori et al 2006). Kakudo and colleagues showed better osteogenesis in cells cultured with osteogenic chemical supplements as compared to control growth medium (Kakudo et al 2008). Taken together, the results of these studies suggest that β-TCP is a better osteogenic scaffold material for ASCs than HA and that atelocollagen scaffolds hold promise for ASC bone engineering applications where their low mechanical strength is acceptable.…”
Section: Substrate Stimulusmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hattori and colleagues describe better osteoconductivity on a β-TCP scaffold for ASCs, as compared with scaffolds of hydroxyapatite (HA) and atelocollagen honeycomb scaffolds (Hattori et al 2006). Kakudo and colleagues showed better osteogenesis in cells cultured with osteogenic chemical supplements as compared to control growth medium (Kakudo et al 2008). Taken together, the results of these studies suggest that β-TCP is a better osteogenic scaffold material for ASCs than HA and that atelocollagen scaffolds hold promise for ASC bone engineering applications where their low mechanical strength is acceptable.…”
Section: Substrate Stimulusmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For evaluation of in vivo osteogenesis, an immunohistochemistry assay was performed to identify osteocalcin in histological sections after 2 weeks culture in osteogenic medium followed by 8 weeks subcutaneous implantation in mice. To gauge osteogenic capacity in vitro, Kakudo and colleagues assessed mineralization and alkaline phosphatase activity at day 14 after induction, also measuring calcification with scanning electron microscopy (Kakudo et al 2008). This group used qRT-PCR to verify increase in expression of osteogenic marker transcription factor Runx2 with respect to control at days 7 and 14 after induction.…”
Section: Substrate Stimulusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It showed that the scaffold was filled with the grown ADSCs and calcification materials. When the ADSCs-loaded honeycomb collagen scaffolds were subcutaneously transplanted into nude mice, bone formation in vivo was identified after 8 weeks (Kakudo et al, 2008).…”
Section: Adipose-derived Stromal Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, many studies have demonstrated that hASCs represent an important new cell source for bone tissue engineering [11][12][13] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%