2010
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.82.046120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boolean versus continuous dynamics on simple two-gene modules

Abstract: We investigate the dynamical behavior of simple modules composed of two genes with two or three regulating connections. Continuous dynamics for mRNA and protein concentrations is compared to a Boolean model for gene activity. Using a generalized method, we study within a single framework different continuous models and different types of regulatory functions, and establish conditions under which the system can display stable oscillations. These conditions concern the time scales, the degree of cooperativity of… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to Theorem 6, very large separation of time scales destroys the consistency for the first system studied in [4], despite the fact that its Boolean approximation is one-stepping. Thus the mechanism for consistency at other time scales that is reported in [4] must be different.…”
Section: Related Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to Theorem 6, very large separation of time scales destroys the consistency for the first system studied in [4], despite the fact that its Boolean approximation is one-stepping. Thus the mechanism for consistency at other time scales that is reported in [4] must be different.…”
Section: Related Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Gehrmann and Drossel [4] obtained results about consistency between ODE models for two small gene regulatory networks and their Boolean approximations. In contrast to Glass networks and [17], in these models the right-hand sides of the ODEs are Lipschitz-continuous, as they are in the models studied here.…”
Section: Related Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mathematical validity of generalized modelling was recently confirmed by rigorous proofs [34], whereas applicability to actual problems from different fields was demonstrated in several recent publications [32,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44].…”
Section: Dynamical Equivalence Of Food Websmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…When studying the dynamical patterns or attractors of model GRNs [20][21][22], predictions depend on the choice of models, e.g., the scaling of the number of attractors with respect to system size in random Boolean networks [23]. While a Boolean approximation to sigmoidal switching interactions seems robust in many cases [24][25][26], several oversimplifications of established models, such as synchronous update of node states, negligence of transmission delays, and homogeneous network elements, can restrict the dynamics or yield artifacts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%