Statistical Modelling and Regression Structures 2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7908-2413-1_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boosting for Estimating Spatially Structured Additive Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A rather different approach to smooth model estimation uses boosting (e.g. Tutz and Binder 2006;Schmid and Hothorn 2008;Robinzonov and Hothorn 2010;Mayr et al 2012). Boosting is a forward selection strategy, in which smooth model components are iteratively built up from over-smoothed versions, fitted to generalized residuals (Hastie and Tibshirani 1986) for additive model fitting.…”
Section: Boostingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A rather different approach to smooth model estimation uses boosting (e.g. Tutz and Binder 2006;Schmid and Hothorn 2008;Robinzonov and Hothorn 2010;Mayr et al 2012). Boosting is a forward selection strategy, in which smooth model components are iteratively built up from over-smoothed versions, fitted to generalized residuals (Hastie and Tibshirani 1986) for additive model fitting.…”
Section: Boostingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical boosting can be thought of in two ways. One, it is an iterative method for obtaining a statistical model, G ( X ), via functional gradient descent (Breiman, 1998; Friedman et al, 2000; Friedman, 2001; Breiman, 1999; Schmid et al, 2010; Nikolay Robinzonov, 2013), where and is the fit-vector , the expected values of Y based on covariate data X . Although boosting has origins in classification algorithms, we now know that it is equivalent to regularized regression, such as the Lasso (Bühlmann & Yu, 2003; Efron et al, 2004, under certain conditions).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An extension to two-dimensional P-splines to include spatial effects or interactions was proposed by Kneib et al [32]. For an application incorporating also spatio-temporal effects see Robinzonov and Hothorn [33]. To include discrete spatial effects such as a regional structure, Sobotka and Kneib [34] proposed a Markov random field base-learner applying a penalization which ensures that neighboring regions share similar effects.…”
Section: New Base-learners For Specific Predictor Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%