“…It thus requires moving beyond theorizing the New Silk Road as an exclusively static top‐down, state‐centric strategy originated in Beijing. Indeed, geographers have recently emphasized the need to also theorize the BRI as a flexible, relational process that depends on the spatial embeddedness of each project, local political and fiscal conditions, unstable local coalitions, and escalating social contestation (Apostolopoulou & Pant, 2022; Han & Webber, 2020; Joniak‐Lüthi, 2020; Murton & Lord, 2020; Ranganathan, 2015; Rippa, 2020; Rogelja, 2020). Yet, despite the major importance of these perspectives, a comprehensive analysis remains largely missing from BRI literature regarding the material geographies and political ecologies of the initiative and its grounded impacts on places, socionatures and livelihoods, including how these are differentiated along lines of class, gender, race, and ethnicity, as well as an exploration of how different social, economic, spatial, and environmental injustices are interlinked.…”