2012
DOI: 10.1504/ijesb.2012.045203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Born Globals: (almost) 20 years of research and still not 'grown up'?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The last two decades, research focusing on International New Ventures (INVs) and Born Global firms (BGs) has developed into a significant research stream as can be witnessed by the number of recent review articles as for example (Aspelund, Madsen, & Moen, 2007;Cesinger, Danko, & Bouncken, 2012;Jones, Coviello, & Tang, 2011;Keupp & Gassmann, 2009;Rialp, Rialp, & Knight, 2005). These types of firms are defined in different ways, but elements of speed, extent and scope (Zahra & George, 2002) of their international engagement are often used in definitions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last two decades, research focusing on International New Ventures (INVs) and Born Global firms (BGs) has developed into a significant research stream as can be witnessed by the number of recent review articles as for example (Aspelund, Madsen, & Moen, 2007;Cesinger, Danko, & Bouncken, 2012;Jones, Coviello, & Tang, 2011;Keupp & Gassmann, 2009;Rialp, Rialp, & Knight, 2005). These types of firms are defined in different ways, but elements of speed, extent and scope (Zahra & George, 2002) of their international engagement are often used in definitions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both BG and INV theories just di↵erentiate the initial speed of the internationalization with criteria in part of the scale dimension: percentage of turnover from overseas in the first three to five years (Madsen, 2013;Zahra, 2005). They did not go further (Cesinger et al, 2012), for instance, to investigate whether the scope and tempo (speed) of internationalization changes (Kuivalainen et al, 2012). This study reveals more variance and changes in motion pattern and behavior patterns.…”
Section: Di↵erence Between Initial Period and Continuous Periodmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A more formal identification of BG came from scholars such as Knight and Cavusgil (1996), who defined technology-oriented firms, which have been involved in international business and operated in international markets from the earliest days of their establishment. Although there is no agreed-upon or consistent criteria on how fast (e.g., two, three or five years) a firm could achieve a certain percentage of overseas turnover (e.g., more than 25% or 75%) to be categorized as BG (Rasmussen and Madsen, 2002;Cesinger et al, 2012), instant or rapid speed is a clear feature of both INV and BG (Madsen, 2013). Some scholars further regard BG as one of the special groups within INV (Zahra, 2005).…”
Section: Swift Featurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent reviews (Cesinger et al 2012;Garcia-Lillo et al 2017;Reuber et al 2017;Martin and Javalgi 2018;Romanello and Chiarvesio 2019) have concluded that there is no consensus on the operational definition of these organizations. Common to the investigations is the idea that these firms are young and internationalize quickly, skipping some stages of the traditional Uppsala model proposed by Johanson and Vahlne (1977), which explains the internationalization as an incremental process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%