2012 38th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference 2012
DOI: 10.1109/pvsc.2012.6317789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boron diffused emitter etch back and passivation

Abstract: In this study, a well-controlled etch-back technique was developed using HF and HN03 mixture solution to remove the boron depletion layer caused by post-oxidation step. The etching rate can be manipulated by changing HF proportion; meanwhile the sheet resistance variation can be maintained smaller than 10% after etching back. Nitric acid oxidation of Si technique was used to passivate the boron emitter before and after etch back. The presence of the surface boron depletion layer makes the surface boron concent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 shows that 3-min etching-back can decrease emitter saturation current density (J oe ) obviously from 170 to 40 fA/cm 2 , which means the "dead layer" at the front surface would be removed and Auger recombination decreased. The trend of J oe with etching time is the same as reported by Li [9]. However, when the etch time increased to 4 min, J oe increased a little on the contrary.…”
Section: Optimization Of Front Surface Fieldsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…7 shows that 3-min etching-back can decrease emitter saturation current density (J oe ) obviously from 170 to 40 fA/cm 2 , which means the "dead layer" at the front surface would be removed and Auger recombination decreased. The trend of J oe with etching time is the same as reported by Li [9]. However, when the etch time increased to 4 min, J oe increased a little on the contrary.…”
Section: Optimization Of Front Surface Fieldsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Generally, in order to avoid the TJS problem for IBC 2156-3381 © 2013 IEEE cells, an undoped gap is needed between rear n+ BSF and rear p+ emitter [9], but it would make the process much more complicated because it requires many steps of masking, opening, etching, and doping, with high-accuracy alignments. In order to mitigate the TJS problem, we simulate this issue by PC1D, which had been used for TJS study by Clugston and Basore [10].…”
Section: A Tunnel Junction Shuntingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After the removal of the BRL by chemical etching, the porous silicon is removed by using 1% NaOH solution for about 20s, so that the sheet resistance increases to about 60Ω/□.After that, AL 2 O 3 is used on both sides of the silicon wafers to passivate the substrate surface. [7,8,9]. The control group was prepared by LTO and HT-HNO 3 , and compared with chemical etching .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After boron diffusion, the sheet resistance and doping profiles were characterized by electrochemical capacitance voltage (ECV) and the boron concentrations near the surface of substrate shown in Fig.1 by the black line is higher than the solubility of boron in silicon [7]. It is considered that the BRL has been formed in this diffusion depth.…”
Section: B Atoms Concentration Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%