2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boron doping effect on the interface interaction and mechanical properties of graphene reinforced copper matrix composite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…51 For both cases of 1LG-Cu-1O and 1LG-Cu-2O, the copper matrix with substitutional oxygen moving into interiors attracts the graphene layer moving closer to its side, suggesting an enhanced interaction between oxygen-mediated copper and graphene (Figure S16, panels a and b). To quantitatively characterize the interfacial mechanical properties, the binding energy between the graphene layer and copper substrate is calculated as E b = E G−M − (E G + E M ), 52 where E C−M , E G , and E M are energies of the hybrid systems, isolated graphene single layer and copper substrate, respectively. As shown in Table S1, the topfcc-1O and hcpfcc-2O cases each have the lowest binding energies of −1.34417 eV and −1.13559 eV.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…51 For both cases of 1LG-Cu-1O and 1LG-Cu-2O, the copper matrix with substitutional oxygen moving into interiors attracts the graphene layer moving closer to its side, suggesting an enhanced interaction between oxygen-mediated copper and graphene (Figure S16, panels a and b). To quantitatively characterize the interfacial mechanical properties, the binding energy between the graphene layer and copper substrate is calculated as E b = E G−M − (E G + E M ), 52 where E C−M , E G , and E M are energies of the hybrid systems, isolated graphene single layer and copper substrate, respectively. As shown in Table S1, the topfcc-1O and hcpfcc-2O cases each have the lowest binding energies of −1.34417 eV and −1.13559 eV.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these oxygen functional groups adversely affect the mechanical and physical properties of graphene. A study on the interaction between Cu and the pristine, atomic oxygen functionalized and boron-or nitrogendoped graphene by density functional theory calculation [98] revealed that the boron-doping effect is comparable or even better than the chemical bridging effect of oxygen. Moreover, it has been reported that boron-doped graphene exhibits higher electrical conductivity than pristine graphene [99] and its mechanical properties are similar to those of pristine graphene [100].…”
Section: Graphenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various fabrication techniques, including hot pressing sintering, spark plasma sintering (SPS), microwave sintering, etc. have been developed in the past many years to produce the CuMCs using graphene as a reinforcement owing to its unique structure and extraordinary physical/mechanical properties [4][5][6][7][8]. For example, Hu et al fabricated graphene reinforced Cu nanocomposites using a laser sintering method and achieved a 22% increase in Vickers hardness [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%