“…Frequently employed geochemical proxies of these carbonate archives include conventional light stable isotope values such as δ 13 C (McConnaughey & Gillikin, ), δ 18 O (Jones & Quitmyer, ) or δ 34 S (Dando et al ., ), radiogenic isotope ratios such as 87 Sr/ 86 Sr (McArthur, ) or main and trace elemental abundances, notably Ca, Mg, Sr, Mn, N, Li, S or Fe or element to calcium ratios [for example, Mg/Ca, Sr/Ca, Ba/Ca, Li/Ca, B/Ca or rare earth elements (REE); Whittaker & Kyser, ; Klein et al ., ; Westermark et al ., ; Freitas et al ., ; Armendáriz et al ., ; Thébault et al ., ; Bau et al ., ; Azmy et al ., ; McCoy et al ., ; Yan et al ., ]. Recently, non‐traditional isotope systems and approaches including δ 44/40 Ca (Immenhauser et al ., ; Böhm et al ., ; Farkaš et al ., ,b; Heinemann et al ., ; Hippler et al ., ), δ 26 Mg (Hippler et al ., ; Planchon et al ., ), δ 137/134 Ba (Lea & Martin, ), 11 B/ 10 B (Vengosh et al ., ; Ma et al ., ), δ 88/86 Sr (Ruggeberg et al ., ), clumped isotopes of CO 2 (Δ 47 ) (Keating‐Bitonti et al ., ; Came et al ., ) or organic proxies such as TEX86 (Mutterlose et al ., ) have been explored. Relevant palaeo‐environmental parameters include pCO 2 , past seawater chemistry, temperature, salinity, pH, alkalinity, weathering patterns and runoff, palaeo‐nutrient levels or information on elemental cycles.…”