2014
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1407545111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Both protein dynamics and ligand concentration can shift the binding mechanism between conformational selection and induced fit

Abstract: This study aimed to shed light on the long debate over whether conformational selection (CS) or induced fit (IF) is the governing mechanism for protein-ligand binding. The main difference between the two scenarios is whether the conformational transition of the protein from the unbound form to the bound form occurs before or after encountering the ligand. Here we introduce the IF fraction (i.e., the fraction of binding events achieved via IF), to quantify the binding mechanism. Using simulations of a model pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
109
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
109
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We and others have previously shown that such mechanisms depend on ligand concentration (17,(25)(26)(27). We have shown here that the molecular origins of this ligand concentration dependence are in the intrinsic affinities of the conformational states and in the effects that ligand has on conformational kinetics.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…We and others have previously shown that such mechanisms depend on ligand concentration (17,(25)(26)(27). We have shown here that the molecular origins of this ligand concentration dependence are in the intrinsic affinities of the conformational states and in the effects that ligand has on conformational kinetics.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…When considering all information available it is difficult (at these nanomolar-to-micromolar concentrations) (23,30) to propose, or even support, a mechanism where association is limited by the selection of a lowly populated, helical PUMA conformation, formed in the absence of MCL-1. Though conformational selection may play a larger role in more structurally complex systems (27), for the particular case of a short, disordered motif binding an already folded protein, this study adds to the mounting experimental evidence for induced-fit mechanisms (14,(16)(17)(18)(19)54).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In isolation an IDP could, perhaps only transiently, occupy a conformation that resembles the bound state. In the pure conformational selection mechanism, the IDP must be in this conformation at the start of the eventually successful encounter with the partner protein (23,24) (Fig. 1A).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notably, several well-studied examples of mesophile–thermophile pairs are enzymes with small-molecule substrates where differences in activity can be correlated with differences in conformational dynamics of a loop involved in substrate binding [6163], whereas RNase H has a large substrate-binding surface and thus can accommodate multiple forms of adaptation through subtle changes in the relative energies of local conformational states. Proteins with large, dynamic binding surfaces and whose substrates exhibit complex internal dynamics of their own complicate the emerging picture of flux through conformational selection and induced-fit binding pathways as determined primarily by conformational exchange kinetics and ligand concentration [64]. The behavior observed in the RNase H family, in which partially binding-competent conformations are sampled in the apo state but require additional induced-fit accommodation after binding substrate, is consistent with experimental observations of interdomain protein–protein interactions [65] and with simulations of RNA-binding U1A protein [66].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%