2015
DOI: 10.1111/bij.12461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Both sexes pay a cost of reproduction in a frog with biparental care

Abstract: The assumption that reproduction is costly is central to life-history theory. Good evidence supporting this premise comes from studies, mostly in short-lived invertebrates, demonstrating a negative relationship between reproduction and longevity. Whether this trade-off operates broadly, for example in males and females and in short-and long-lived organisms, remains unresolved. We found a negative relationship between reproduction and days survived in captive, wild-caught, individuals of a long-lived poison fro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(101 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental studies corroborate the general idea that brood size has an optimum and reproducing more reduces fitness (Lindén & Møller 1989; Dijkstra et al 1990; Koskela 1998; Aubret et al 2003; Koivula et al 2003; Santos & Nakagawa 2012; Aloise King et al 2013; Thomson et al 2014; Dugas et al 2015), though the cost can be paid primarily by offspring, mothers, or fathers (in species with contributing males). Though a representative review of the relevant literature is beyond the scope of this article, the following examples illustrate the cost of enlarged brood size in two vertebrate species.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Experimental studies corroborate the general idea that brood size has an optimum and reproducing more reduces fitness (Lindén & Møller 1989; Dijkstra et al 1990; Koskela 1998; Aubret et al 2003; Koivula et al 2003; Santos & Nakagawa 2012; Aloise King et al 2013; Thomson et al 2014; Dugas et al 2015), though the cost can be paid primarily by offspring, mothers, or fathers (in species with contributing males). Though a representative review of the relevant literature is beyond the scope of this article, the following examples illustrate the cost of enlarged brood size in two vertebrate species.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Regardless of any causal links that may exist between reduced energy storage and increased parasite loads, our results show that both occur as costs of reproduction for male and female brown anoles. This is broadly consistent with the theoretical prediction that total reproductive investment should be comparable for males and females, and it supports the emerging view that males and females share many of the same costs of reproduction (Fedorka et al ., ; Paukku & Kotiaho, ; Penn & Smith, ; Hoffman et al ., ; Cox, ; Dugas et al ., ). The present study also presents a new experimental framework for directly comparing costs of reproduction between sexes by using the same measures of cost and manipulations of total reproductive investment over the same period of time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, brood manipulations only address a single aspect of reproductive investment, and their generality is unclear beyond the relatively small proportion of species that provide biparental care (Cox, ). Other studies have directly compared the costs of reproduction between the sexes by manipulating mating frequency or the duration of exposure to mates (Kotiaho & Simmons, ; Fedorka, Zuk & Mousseau, ; Dugas, Wamelink & Richards‐Zawacki, ), although the costs associated solely with mating likely represent different fractions of total reproductive investment for each sex. An ideal approach would manipulate total reproductive investment and directly compare the magnitude of its associated costs between the sexes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Dugas et al. ). A series of laboratory‐based, experimental, dichotomous preference studies with populations of O. pumilio in Bocas del Toro, Panama, have found that females generally prefer to associate with males from their native population and color morph (e.g., Summers et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Females are the choosy sex in O. pumilio, and this strategy may have evolved due to the extensive parental care exhibited by O. pumilio, which includes female egg transport and daily tadpole feeding (Haase & Pr€ ohl 2002;Savage 2002). Such behaviors may increase energy investments by females and lead to a shorter life span (Trivers 1972;Siddiqi et al 2004;Dugas et al 2015). A series of laboratory-based, experimental, dichotomous preference studies with populations of O. pumilio in Bocas del Toro, Panama, have found that females generally prefer to associate with males from their native population and color morph (e.g., Summers et al 1999;Graham-Reynolds & Fitzpatrick 2007;Maan & Cummings 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%