2016
DOI: 10.13053/rcs-118-1-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Botnet Detection using Clustering Algorithms

Abstract: In this paper, some clustering techniques are analyzed to compare their ability to detect botnet traffic by selecting features that distinguish connections belonging to or not belonging to a botnet. By considering the history of network's connections, some clustering algorithms are used to derive a set of rules to decide which should be considered as a botnet. Our main contribution is to evaluate different clustering techniques to detect botnets based on their detection rate (true and false positives). The alg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Francisco Villegas Alejandre, Nareli Cruz Cortés, Eleazar Aguirre Anaya, 2016 [15] compared some clustering techniques on their ability to detect botnet traffic by selecting features that distinguish connections belonging to or not belonging to a botnet. It was found that the K-medoids algorithm was better for almost all the experiments than K-means.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Francisco Villegas Alejandre, Nareli Cruz Cortés, Eleazar Aguirre Anaya, 2016 [15] compared some clustering techniques on their ability to detect botnet traffic by selecting features that distinguish connections belonging to or not belonging to a botnet. It was found that the K-medoids algorithm was better for almost all the experiments than K-means.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Final cluster centroidsCluster 0:This cluster is purely in majority with 71% of the points lying in cluster 0. Cluster 0 mainly uses the TCP protocol and has an average length of 76 15. units.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%