Boundaries and Multiple Relationships

Hammond, Sabine

doi:10.1002/9780470660041.ch11

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In a clinical practice setting, the supervisee may meet the supervisor regularly outside the supervision context, for example, at team meetings. According to the Code of Ethics 2007, multiple relationships need to be managed carefully when they cannot be avoided (Hammond, 2010). Multiple relationships and roles in the supervision context can be especially problematic because the supervisor is holding a dual role by definition (facilitator of professional competence in the supervisee and also evaluator and gatekeeper; see also Behnke, 2005).…”

Section: Supervisory Relationships: Dealing With Dual or Multiple Rolesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ethical Issues in Supervision

Hammond¹,

Wingenfeld²

2006

The New Handbook of Counseling Supervision

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

, and can be regarded as a "signature pedagogy" in the field of psychology (Bernard & Goodyear, 2014, p. 2). In the 1970s supervision began to establish itself as distinct from its roots in counselling psychology (Carroll, 2007). During the 1980s the profession shifted to a view of supervision as requiring specific knowledge and skills (Pettifor, Sinclair, & Falender, 2014). This shift is reflected in the emergence of new supervision models and approaches (see Watkins & Milne, 2014). In Australia, similar to other countries, the focus on supervision as a professional competence increased after 2000. In their review of the literature on supervision and its effectiveness on clinical practice and client outcomes, Spence, Wilson, Kavanagh, Strong, and Worrall (2001) concluded that there was tentative evidence for the positive influence of supervision on supervisee practice, though the authors also concluded that the review raised more questions than answers. As a professional activity, intervention or service, supervision raises a number of ethical issues and challenges. The past decade has seen the emergence of ethical guidelines on supervision (

show abstract

Section: Supervisory Relationships: Dealing With Dual or Multiple Rolesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ethical Issues in Supervision

Hammond¹,

Wingenfeld²

2006

The New Handbook of Counseling Supervision

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

References

2011

Ethics in Psychotherapy and Counseling

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Assessing Professional Boundaries in Clinical Settings: The Development of the Boundaries in Practice Scale

et al. 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article reports on the Boundaries in Practice (BIP) Scale developed to measure knowledge, comfort, ethical decision making, and experience. Few instruments used in studies conducted on professional/ client boundaries have been validated. The BIP demonstrated sound face, content and construct validity, and adequate internal consistency reliability. The BIP Scale provides the first reliable and valid means of investigating multiple boundary domains across health disciplines and teams. The sensitivity and complexity of boundary issues and the serious consequences of breaches highlight the importance of a valid and reliable measure in building empirical knowledge in this field.

show abstract

Boundaries and Multiple Relationships

Cited by 3 publications

References 20 publications

Ethical Issues in Supervision

Ethical Issues in Supervision

References

Assessing Professional Boundaries in Clinical Settings: The Development of the Boundaries in Practice Scale

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About