2010
DOI: 10.1080/00330121003788309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundaries Make a Difference: The Effects of Spatial and Temporal Parameters on Conservation Planning*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantifying functional relationships between giant gartersnake vital rates and climatic variables, habitat characteristics, and management actions, and incorporating those relationships into IPMs is also an important next step. Because of the loss of >90% of their natural wetland habitats (Huber et al ), giant gartersnakes now largely inhabit created marshes and canals associated with rice agriculture (Halstead et al , Wylie et al ), and survival of adult giant gartersnakes has been linked to the amount of aquatic habitat surrounding an individual's home range (Halstead et al ). Most remaining wetlands used by giant gartersnakes are managed by manipulating the timing and amount of water released (Duffy and Kahara ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantifying functional relationships between giant gartersnake vital rates and climatic variables, habitat characteristics, and management actions, and incorporating those relationships into IPMs is also an important next step. Because of the loss of >90% of their natural wetland habitats (Huber et al ), giant gartersnakes now largely inhabit created marshes and canals associated with rice agriculture (Halstead et al , Wylie et al ), and survival of adult giant gartersnakes has been linked to the amount of aquatic habitat surrounding an individual's home range (Halstead et al ). Most remaining wetlands used by giant gartersnakes are managed by manipulating the timing and amount of water released (Duffy and Kahara ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, we calculated relative NR area of each ecoregion (percent of land area in each ecoregion occupied by NRs). In gap analyses, a predefined minimum extent of each ecological component is considered necessary to analyze ecological function and viability (Villard and Jonsson 2009;Huber et al 2010). These conservation thresholds assure that no ecological components are excluded from gap analyses (Margules and Pressey 2000;Villard and Jonsson 2009;Huber et al 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In gap analyses, a predefined minimum extent of each ecological component is considered necessary to analyze ecological function and viability (Villard and Jonsson 2009;Huber et al 2010). These conservation thresholds assure that no ecological components are excluded from gap analyses (Margules and Pressey 2000;Villard and Jonsson 2009;Huber et al 2010). We set the threshold for our study at 10% minimum extent coverage by NRs in each ecoregion based on previous studies (Soutullo et al 2008;Jenkins and Joppa 2009;Huber et al 2010;Wu et al 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations