2018
DOI: 10.1088/1742-5468/aab685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary conditions in random sequential adsorption

Abstract: The influence of different boundary conditions on the density of random packings of disks is studied. Packings are generated using the random sequential adsorption algorithm with three different types of boundary conditions: periodic, open, and wall. It is found that the finite size effects are smallest for periodic boundary conditions, as expected. On the other hand, in the case of open and wall boundaries it is possible to introduce an effective packing size and a constant correction term to significantly im… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been shown for RSA of disks that the measured value of saturated packing fraction for small packings os-cillates with respect to the system size, similar to the oscillations found in the tail of the autocorrelation function [25]. Therefore, it was expected (as a packing side length used in the study is much larger than 5) that the finite-size effects should not affect obtained values of packing fraction.…”
Section: Finite-size Effectssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…It has been shown for RSA of disks that the measured value of saturated packing fraction for small packings os-cillates with respect to the system size, similar to the oscillations found in the tail of the autocorrelation function [25]. Therefore, it was expected (as a packing side length used in the study is much larger than 5) that the finite-size effects should not affect obtained values of packing fraction.…”
Section: Finite-size Effectssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Could this indicate a mistake, for example, that leads to the generation of unsaturated configurations? One way to double check is to calculate RSA saturation densities of regular ngons with large n, since as n increases, φ s should approach that for disks, 0.547067 · · · [30]. We thus calculated φ s for 19gons and 29gons, and found 0.546210 ± 0.000080 and 0.546701 ± 0.000067, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…There are additional maximas for particles with non-equivalent faces, such as truncated tetrahedron. According to [35], G(r) is strictly connected with an error in packing fraction introduced by finite size effects, so, as there are almost no correlations after r = 5, finite size effects should be negligible for a packing size used in this study. In order to measure full orientational order propagation, the order parameters conforming to polyhedral groups of point symmetries were used:…”
Section: B Microstructural Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 94%