2006
DOI: 10.1007/bf02686236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary institutions and HIV/AIDS policy in Brazil and South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ethnic fractionalisation is included in the analyses to control for the possibility that in ethnically divided societies, elites will be less likely to mobilize around HIV/ AIDS policies because of a fear that such mobilisation would stigmatise their own ethnic group as Lieberman (2007) and Gauri and Lieberman (2006) hypothesise and find support for. Following the work of Lieberman (2007), we employ Fearon's Cultural Fractionalisation measure in the tests.…”
Section: Country Responses To the Aids Epidemicmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ethnic fractionalisation is included in the analyses to control for the possibility that in ethnically divided societies, elites will be less likely to mobilize around HIV/ AIDS policies because of a fear that such mobilisation would stigmatise their own ethnic group as Lieberman (2007) and Gauri and Lieberman (2006) hypothesise and find support for. Following the work of Lieberman (2007), we employ Fearon's Cultural Fractionalisation measure in the tests.…”
Section: Country Responses To the Aids Epidemicmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In a case study of South Africa and Brazil, Gauri and Lieberman (2006) argue that when a society is ethnically divided, elites will be less likely to mobilise around HIV/AIDS policies because of fear that such mobilisation would stigmatise their own ethnic group. Elites may feel that by addressing the health problem straight on with legitimate government action, their ethnic group could suffer reputational consequences.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…What we are proposing is a more nuanced explanation that suggests that intra-state (domestic) and across state (external) linkages activate strong domestic responses even when domestic boundary institutions may suggest otherwise. And, India's weaker capacity outlined in Eimer and Lutz (2010) is due to the specific linkage mechanisms outlined here that render its state unable to bargain effectively with the 7 See Gauri and Lieberman (2006). Also see, Lieberman (2009).…”
Section: The Puzzle: Variation In the Trade-off Between Patents Profmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…88 There were two different views on treatment within the government: the former Deputy Health Minister supported it and Mbecki, South Africa's President, denied it. 89 Gauri and Lieberman (2006).…”
Section: Conclusion: Implications and Comparative Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their comparative analysis of the Brazilian and South African responses to their respective AIDS epidemics, Gauri and Lieberman consider the impact of civil society, but ultimately suggest that two other factors-institutions and the norms of political communities-are responsible for the divergences they found. 31 Here we suggest the ways in which civil society involvement may be the decisive factor in determining AIDS treatment policy direction and success.…”
Section: Why the Path Mattersmentioning
confidence: 99%