1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf01049816
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary layer development in supersonic MHD generators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Estimates for the GFT under consideration revealed that the values of the thickness of dynamic (δ) and thermal (δ t ) boundary layers on the insulating walls at the center of the electrode zone are close to the value of half-width a/2 of the MHD channel even in the case of hydraulically smooth walls (Fig. 3) [10,11]. The mode of loading of MHD generator was determined by matching the experimentally obtained and predicted values of electric field intensity E y at the center of the electrode zone for the known value of B 0 .…”
Section: Results Of Experimental Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Estimates for the GFT under consideration revealed that the values of the thickness of dynamic (δ) and thermal (δ t ) boundary layers on the insulating walls at the center of the electrode zone are close to the value of half-width a/2 of the MHD channel even in the case of hydraulically smooth walls (Fig. 3) [10,11]. The mode of loading of MHD generator was determined by matching the experimentally obtained and predicted values of electric field intensity E y at the center of the electrode zone for the known value of B 0 .…”
Section: Results Of Experimental Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…(4) Here, I a and I c denote the experimentally obtained values of currents of the anode and cathode of the nth section, respectively; l and a denote the length and width of an electrode section, respectively; u g∞ is the velocity of the gas phase in the flow core; E y = (U c + + ΔV Σ )/h, where U c is the voltage on the electrodes of the MHD channel, and ΔV Σ is the total electrode drop of voltage with measured values of current density on the anode and cathode; h is the spacing between the electrodes; and is the displacement thickness of current for the boundary layers on the insulating walls [10]. Expressions (1)-(3) are valid on condition of quasi-one-dimensionality of the flow of currents d Jx /dx ≈ 0, which is valid for close values of I an and I cn .…”
Section: Procedures For Experimental Determination Of Values Of Conducmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the uncooled full-scale channel, the inclusion of the effect of the boundary layers results in an increase of calculated conductivity in the flow core by ≈3% in the inlet cross section and by ≈8% in the outlet cross section of the channel. For the cooled channels, additional calculations were performed of two-dimensional boundary layers in the gasdynamic flow train in view of the injection of cooling gas [11].…”
Section: Results Of Experimental Investigations Of Electrophysical Chmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each test, the experimentally obtained values of p comb , α, and g were used to calculate the respective values of electrical conductivity [9] in view of the effect of heat loss in the PG and of the displacement thickness of boundary layer in the measuring channel whose value was determined in a two-dimensional approximation [11]. Because the thickness of boundary layers turned out to be insignificant, their effect on the predicted value of electrical conductivity did not exceed 3%.…”
Section: Results Of Experimental Investigations Of Electrical Conductmentioning
confidence: 99%