2003
DOI: 10.1243/095765003322315405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary layer investigations on a highly loaded transonic compressor cascade with shock/laminar boundary layer interactions

Abstract: Detailed experimental and numerical investigations of the flowfield and boundary layer on a highly loaded transonic compressor cascade were performed at various Mach and Reynolds numbers representative of real turbomachinery conditions. The emerging shock system interacts with the laminar boundary layer, causing shock-induced separation with turbulent reattachment. Steady two-dimensional calculations have been performed using the Navier—Stokes solver TRACE-U. The flow solver employs a modified version of the o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conventionally, H=2.59 Blasius boundary layer [29] is typical of laminar flows, while H=1.3 to 1.4 is typical of turbulent flows. At x/C=0.3, strong shock-induced boundary layer separation with reattachment is characterized by the significant rise in shape factor in the interaction zone and the steep decrease further downstream [30]. The reattachment in the high Reynolds case is at x/C=0.5 whereas in low Reynolds it is at x/C=0.6.…”
Section: Comparison Of Cascade and Test Sectionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conventionally, H=2.59 Blasius boundary layer [29] is typical of laminar flows, while H=1.3 to 1.4 is typical of turbulent flows. At x/C=0.3, strong shock-induced boundary layer separation with reattachment is characterized by the significant rise in shape factor in the interaction zone and the steep decrease further downstream [30]. The reattachment in the high Reynolds case is at x/C=0.5 whereas in low Reynolds it is at x/C=0.6.…”
Section: Comparison Of Cascade and Test Sectionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Modern aircraft engines with highly loaded transonic compressors have a great potential to minimize the weight and length of an axial compressor by reducing the number of compressor stages [1]. This leads to an increase in flow velocities relative to the blades with supersonic speeds and shock waves upstream and within the blade passages [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The compressor cascade V103-220 shown in Figure 4 is chosen as the verification model. It was designed for the hub section of a stator blade in a highly loaded axial compressor (Bell & Fottner, 1995;Hilgenfeld, Cardamone, & Fottner, 2003). This compressor cascade is constructed by conventional NACA-65 blades with a circular camber line.…”
Section: Validation Of Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of these facts, the V103-220 compressor cascade is considered to be an appropriate model for investigating inverse design under high subsonic and transonic flow regimes. More detailed information about the test facility and measuring techniques of this compressor cascade can be found in Bell are Fottner (1995) and Hilgenfeld et al (2003).…”
Section: Validation Of Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ratio of total Reynolds stresses to normal Reynolds stresses linear compressor cascade, widely studied in the literature [52,53,54,55,56] and already used as a test case in our previous works [18,19]. The cascade is representative of the mid-span section of a stator blade in a highly loaded axial compressor [52].…”
Section: Test Case Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%