1983
DOI: 10.1007/bf01236354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary layer separation singularities for an upstream moving wall

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, on close examination the separation profile was found to exhibit a local maximum near the wall, and the growth of the boundary layer was found to be O(t s − t) −1/4 , matching that of the upstream-slipping singularity structure described by Van Dommelen & Shen (1982) and Elliott et al (1983). Nevertheless the downstream-slipping case has been of historical interest (Williams 1977), as well as being controversial, and local analyses have been carried out by Van Dommelen (1981) and Van Dommelen & Shen (1983) in an effort to describe such a structure. In addition, sketches of the anticipated streamline patterns expected near the singular structure have been given by Sears & Telionis (1975) and subsequently modified by Van Dommelen (1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…However, on close examination the separation profile was found to exhibit a local maximum near the wall, and the growth of the boundary layer was found to be O(t s − t) −1/4 , matching that of the upstream-slipping singularity structure described by Van Dommelen & Shen (1982) and Elliott et al (1983). Nevertheless the downstream-slipping case has been of historical interest (Williams 1977), as well as being controversial, and local analyses have been carried out by Van Dommelen (1981) and Van Dommelen & Shen (1983) in an effort to describe such a structure. In addition, sketches of the anticipated streamline patterns expected near the singular structure have been given by Sears & Telionis (1975) and subsequently modified by Van Dommelen (1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…While this three-dimensional form of the MRS condition seems new, the general applicability of the two-dimensional case is fairly well established both theoretically (Moore 1958, Sears Rt Telionis 1975, Williams 1977, Shen 1978, Sychev 1979len Rt Shen 1980b, 1983a,b, Van Dommelen 1981 and experimentally (Ludwig 1964, Didden & Ho 1985.…”
Section: Y U = D D Y W = Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Part of the thickening of the boundary layer going towards separation from the upstream side is then due to additional streamlines coming from downstream that become part of the velocity profile. Van Dommelen & Shen (1983a) show that a self-consistent and reasonably complete mathematical description of their proposed flow exists in the non-interactive case. This description can explain the flattening of the velocity profile at flow reversal postulated in the MRS model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The sketches on the left show streamlines and velocity profiles for a fixed wall, and those on the right for an upstream moving wall. Streamline profiles: (a) Moore (1958), (b) Sears & Telionis (1975), (c) Van Dommelen & Shen (1983a). (d) Velocity profiles as proposed by Sears & Telionis (1975).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation