2003
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2134111100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary of quantum evolution under decoherence

Abstract: Relaxation effects impose fundamental limitations on our ability to coherently control quantum mechanical phenomena. In this article, we use principles of optimal control theory to establish physical limits on how closely a quantum mechanical system can be steered to a desired target state in the presence of relaxation. In particular, we explicitly compute the maximum amplitude of coherence or polarization that can be transferred between coupled heteronuclear spins in large molecules at high magnetic fields in… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
99
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the last phase, 2I y S z is lifted in a an optimal way to 2I z S z , which is again protected against relaxation [31]. Although for simplicity, CSA relaxation was not considered in this example, it is straight-forward to include CSA relaxation as well as the effects of cross-correlation in the relaxation matrix and to numerically optimize corresponding pulses (data not shown) [33]. Furthermore, the algorithm is not limited to two coupled spins and more complicated relaxation networks can be taken into account.…”
Section: Relaxation-optimized Pulse Elements (Rope)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last phase, 2I y S z is lifted in a an optimal way to 2I z S z , which is again protected against relaxation [31]. Although for simplicity, CSA relaxation was not considered in this example, it is straight-forward to include CSA relaxation as well as the effects of cross-correlation in the relaxation matrix and to numerically optimize corresponding pulses (data not shown) [33]. Furthermore, the algorithm is not limited to two coupled spins and more complicated relaxation networks can be taken into account.…”
Section: Relaxation-optimized Pulse Elements (Rope)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a few exceptional cases, for example one or two spins (or qubits) [144][145][146][147][148][149], a harmonic oscillator [150,151], or a sequence of Λ-systems subject to decay [152,153], the external controls can be determined using geometric techniques based on Pontryagin's maximum principle [4]. Typically, however, the control problem cannot be solved in closed form, and one needs to resort to numerical optimization.…”
Section: Optimal Control Of Open Quantum Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, optimization of an open system's dynamics for targets that rely on quantum coherence is intrinsically biased toward those subspaces in Hilbert (or Liouville) space that are least affected by decoherence [170]. For example, transfer of coherence and polarization between coupled heteronuclear spins was improved by cross-correlated relaxation optimized pulse (CROP) sequences and relaxation optimized pulse elements (ROPE) [144,145,171,172]. Optimization can take both longitudinal and transveral relaxation into account [171].…”
Section: B Fighting and Avoiding Decoherencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results were applied to a variety of NMR problems, including polarization transfer between spin species [1,2,3,4,5,6], and cross-polarization in solids [7,8,6]. Extensions to non-Hermitian operators and non-unitary dissipative evolution were developed [9,10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%