Boundary tourism and touristic boundaries in Marseille’s northern districts

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to discuss the touristic classification of the developing practices in the northern districts of Marseille (France). Design/methodology/approach This paper is based on participant observation and semi-structured interviews, sometimes conducted within a sightseeing tour situation and loosely inspired by the “guided tours” technique. Findings The paper shows there is currently no definition of tourism in itself, just tourism for itself. Hence, the touristic classification of the implementations in Marseille’s northern districts is relative, relational and transversal. Research limitations/implications The paper does not exhaust (far from it) the subject of the touristic classification of the implementations in Marseille or, a fortiori, the debate on what “makes” tourism. This paper is simply one link in the historical chain of Marseille’s northern districts, which are (or are not) currently being invented as a tourist destination. Practical implications This research has led to sustained and continuous exchanges since 2012 with the Hôtel du Nord cooperative, which discusses and integrates the academic point of view into its practice, most notably to advance in its relationship with the touristic classification of the practices it deploys. Originality/value The contribution made by this paper to the debate on the classification of contemporary tourism is based on a domain that is as yet relatively unexplored from this point of view and which has benefited from the close investigation of practices that the author’s embedded-researcher position has allowed.

Optimum spatial scale of regional tourism cooperation based on spillover effects in tourism flows

“…Considering the existing research on regional tourism cooperation at home and abroad, most scholars only stop at the construction and spatial structure of regional tourism cooperation, although some have realized the importance of the spatial scale (Hascoët, 2019; Li et al, 2020; Wang, 2009), and use various qualitative or quantitative methods to explore. However, some deficiencies remain: (1) in the qualitative research, only the approximate scale of the regional tourism cooperation is provided, and no explanation is given as to whether the scale of the regional tourism cooperation is appropriate; (2) in the quantitative research, either the spillover effect between regions is not considered or the spillover effect between multiple destinations could not be described simultaneously; and (3) previous methods do not consider the relevance of the geographic space.…”