2005
DOI: 10.1109/mcg.2005.37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bounded Blending for Function-Based Shape Modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When m = 1, it boils down to a simple sum, as the popular operator of Blinn [3], whose continuous extension by Bloomenthal et al [23] yielded to convolution implicit surfaces. While several new composition operators [24,25,26] and composition concepts [27,28] are introduced for field functions with global support, operators for compactly supported fields received less attention until the last decade. Hsu et al [13] improved the control of the blending size using adequate transfer functions modifying the slope of the composed field functions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When m = 1, it boils down to a simple sum, as the popular operator of Blinn [3], whose continuous extension by Bloomenthal et al [23] yielded to convolution implicit surfaces. While several new composition operators [24,25,26] and composition concepts [27,28] are introduced for field functions with global support, operators for compactly supported fields received less attention until the last decade. Hsu et al [13] improved the control of the blending size using adequate transfer functions modifying the slope of the composed field functions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the variational technique has global influence (Figure 5a), however, we also construct a bounding field to restrict the warp to a local region. Application of the bounding field is similar to the bounded blending technique [22], however there the artist had to manually define a bounding field using primitive composition. The Warp node automatically constructs a bounding field using the stored WarpCurve as a skeleton.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it is easily possible to combine implicitly defined surfaces in various ways, e.g., by blending them together or by Boolean operations (CSG), see e.g. [4,15,23].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each bisector half-plane we define two blending half-planes B l j 1 The curves are projected orthogonally in the plane with normal (∇ f )(v) through v, and then ordered clockwise. and B r j which include a user-specified small angle θ with B j and also contain the line (23).…”
Section: Implicitly Defined Verticesmentioning
confidence: 99%