1990
DOI: 10.1177/0148607190014005508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bowel Function of Long‐Term Tube‐Fed Patients Consuming Formulae with and without Dietary Fiber

Abstract: Diarrhea, constipation and subsequent laxative use are chronic problems in long-term enterally fed patients. We have conducted a double-blind randomized crossover study to evaluate the effects of two enteral formulae (Enrich, 12.8 g of dietary fiber per 1000 kcal and Ensure, fiber-free) on stool frequency, fecal weight, laxative use, gastrointestinal tolerance and bowel function in chronic care tube-fed patients. Twenty-eight subjects (24 male, 4 female) completed the study. Mean daily number of stools and mea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
47
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The results indicate that the consumption of insoluble FRF relative to the cellulose could significantly (P a 0.05) increase the fecal moisture content, fecal wet weight, and fecal dry weight up to 112, 162, and 152%, respectively. From the findings of Shankardass et al [27], the fecal weight varied widely with the type and quantity of dietary fiber being consumed. Table 4 shows that the fecal bulking effect with insoluble FRF diet (4.60) was significantly (P a 0.05) higher than that with cellulose diet (1.88).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results indicate that the consumption of insoluble FRF relative to the cellulose could significantly (P a 0.05) increase the fecal moisture content, fecal wet weight, and fecal dry weight up to 112, 162, and 152%, respectively. From the findings of Shankardass et al [27], the fecal weight varied widely with the type and quantity of dietary fiber being consumed. Table 4 shows that the fecal bulking effect with insoluble FRF diet (4.60) was significantly (P a 0.05) higher than that with cellulose diet (1.88).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25) Although ED does not contain dietary fiber that could stimulate intestinal mucosa and progress an ulcer, it could cause damage to the intestinal environment, such as withering of the intestinal mucosa, decreased digestive enzyme activity, and changed intestinal bacterial flora. [26][27][28][29] In the present study, the Ca within 60 minutes after ED feeding, whereas CWP-D mitigated this decrease (Table 1). It would be possible that CWP-D activated CaT1, thereby reducing the decrease in the intestinal calcium absorption in vivo.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 47%
“…Therefore, the observed increase in fecal moisture at a low pH may be due to the growth of Lactobacillus spp. In another study, fecal output was also increased in human volunteers ingesting PHGG both at a dose of 36 g/day for 4 weeks [44] and 12 g/100 ml beverage/day for 12 weeks [33]. A clinical study has also showed that PHGG was effective in preventing constipation by increasing bulking capacity in the institutionalized elderly women and men who took laxatives on a regular basis.…”
Section: Phgg Improves the Constipation Condition With Increasing Thementioning
confidence: 92%