2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1440-2440(03)80031-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bowling workload and the risk of injury in elite cricket fast bowlers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
122
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
122
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, reducing this level of workload past the lower threshold necessary to encourage physiological adaptation may potentially increase injury risk due to inadequate fitness 20 . For example, the existence of both low and high thresholds of workload has been found in the sport of cricket, beyond which the risk of injury was likely to increase 21 . A protective effect was discovered in fast bowlers who had an average of 2-5 days rest between bowling sessions, whereas bowlers who had less than 2 days or more than 5 days rest between sessions were at a significantly greater risk of injury 21 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, reducing this level of workload past the lower threshold necessary to encourage physiological adaptation may potentially increase injury risk due to inadequate fitness 20 . For example, the existence of both low and high thresholds of workload has been found in the sport of cricket, beyond which the risk of injury was likely to increase 21 . A protective effect was discovered in fast bowlers who had an average of 2-5 days rest between bowling sessions, whereas bowlers who had less than 2 days or more than 5 days rest between sessions were at a significantly greater risk of injury 21 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the existence of both low and high thresholds of workload has been found in the sport of cricket, beyond which the risk of injury was likely to increase 21 . A protective effect was discovered in fast bowlers who had an average of 2-5 days rest between bowling sessions, whereas bowlers who had less than 2 days or more than 5 days rest between sessions were at a significantly greater risk of injury 21 . Furthermore, likelihood of injury for bowlers averaging less than 123 or more than 188 deliveries per week was significantly greater than bowlers who averaged between 123 and 188 deliveries 21 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both high and low overall bowling workloads have been identified as an injury risk factor. [3] While a high workload would seem intuitive and it has been demonstrated that bowling more than 50 overs in a match or more than 30 overs in the last innings of a match leads to an increase in injury likelihood for the subsequent month, [4] the reason why a low workload is dangerous is less clear. Recent research suggests that low workloads are a risk factor because they are related to subsequent rapid increases (spikes) in the bowling load, which is also an identified injury risk factor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Greater the practicing hours greater the skill achieved. Too much practice may lead to overuse injuries, so work load can be considered as a risk factor for sports related injuries [22][23][24][25] . It is accepted fact that there are several risk factors for sports injuries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%