2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2004.07.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain activation during vaginocervical self-stimulation and orgasm in women with complete spinal cord injury: fMRI evidence of mediation by the Vagus nerves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
175
1
8

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 273 publications
(194 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
10
175
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…6,12 Recent studies provide compelling evidence for the involvement of the vagus nerve in the sensory component of orgasm. Komisaruk et al 13,14 hypothesised that the nucleus tractus solitarii in the medulla oblangata to which the vagus nerves project, is activated during orgasm. Support for this theory is derived from animal studies 13 and functional magnetic resonance imaging on women with complete SCI at or above T10 (n ¼ 4), 14 which demonstrated activation of the inferior region of the nucleus tractus solitarii on vaginal-cervical selfstimulation.…”
Section: Sexual Arousalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,12 Recent studies provide compelling evidence for the involvement of the vagus nerve in the sensory component of orgasm. Komisaruk et al 13,14 hypothesised that the nucleus tractus solitarii in the medulla oblangata to which the vagus nerves project, is activated during orgasm. Support for this theory is derived from animal studies 13 and functional magnetic resonance imaging on women with complete SCI at or above T10 (n ¼ 4), 14 which demonstrated activation of the inferior region of the nucleus tractus solitarii on vaginal-cervical selfstimulation.…”
Section: Sexual Arousalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, it is problematic to equate simple intensity and satisfaction. Self-report studies consistently show predictable differences between orgasms on the basis of stimulation site, which is consistent with the objective physiological differences between vaginal, cervical and clitoral stimulation (Komisaruk, Beyers-Flores, & Whipple, 2006;Komisaruk & Whipple, 1995;Komisaruk et al, 2004Komisaruk et al, , 2011. It is surprising that Prause argues against self-report studies, given that her proposals are almost exclusively based on self-reports.…”
mentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Vaginal stimulation also produces a much greater analgesic (but not anesthetic) response than clitoral stimulation, which further increases when the vaginal stimulation elicits orgasm -this effect is not explained by distraction (Komisaruk & Whipple, 1995;Komisaruk et al, 2004;Whipple & Komisaruk, 1985, 1998.…”
Section: Anatomical and Physiological Differences Between Vagina Cermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Arnow et al, 2002), sexual behavior (e.g. Komisaruk et al, 2004), conditioned rewards such as money and positive feedbacks (e.g. Delgado et al, 2000, O'Doherty et al, 2001), but also abstract conditioned rewards such as light flashes (e.g.…”
Section: Neuroeconomic Insights On Utilitymentioning
confidence: 99%