2016
DOI: 10.1002/cne.23993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain composition inHeliconiusbutterflies, posteclosion growth and experience‐dependent neuropil plasticity

Abstract: Behavioral and sensory adaptations are often reflected in the differential expansion of brain components. These volumetric differences represent changes in cell number, size and/or connectivity, which may denote changes in the functional and evolutionary relationships between different brain regions, and between brain composition and behavioral ecology. Here, we describe the brain composition of two species of Heliconius butterflies, a long-standing study system for investigating ecological adaptation and spec… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
93
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
(250 reference statements)
6
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They possess a configuration of five neuropils that is shared across many species, consisting of the lamina, medulla, a lobula complex composed of the lobula and the lobula plate, and the accessory medulla. As expected from the nocturnal lifestyle of the Bogong moth, the total relative volume of the optic lobe is about 50% smaller than in the diurnal Monarch butterfly, consistent with data on other butterflies (Montgomery et al 2016). Interestingly, despite the overall size difference, the internal layout of each optic lobe neuropil is remarkably conserved between the two species.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They possess a configuration of five neuropils that is shared across many species, consisting of the lamina, medulla, a lobula complex composed of the lobula and the lobula plate, and the accessory medulla. As expected from the nocturnal lifestyle of the Bogong moth, the total relative volume of the optic lobe is about 50% smaller than in the diurnal Monarch butterfly, consistent with data on other butterflies (Montgomery et al 2016). Interestingly, despite the overall size difference, the internal layout of each optic lobe neuropil is remarkably conserved between the two species.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…These include a suboesophageal ganglion that is fused with the brain, well-developed optic lobes, large antennal lobes, a complex organization of the mushroom body with a multi-layered double calyx and an intricately organized lobe system. One feature of the mushroom body in particular appears to be a defining characteristic of moths and butterflies, namely the presence of the Y-tract with its associated lobelets (Heinze and Reppert 2012;Sjöholm et al 2005;Montgomery et al 2016;Homberg et al 1988). A second unusual feature of lepidopteran brains is that the PB of the CX is split across the midline, in contrast to other insects, in which this neuropil forms a continuous, midline-spanning structure (Heinze and Reppert 2012;Stöckl et al 2016;el Jundi et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mushroom body elaboration in parasitoid Hymenoptera has been attributed not to the evolution of eusociality but to the evolution of olfactory spatial memory that informs the individual about the location and readiness of an intended host to receive the parasitoid's egg (Farris & Schulmeister, 2011). There is a direct relationship between the size of paired mushroom bodies and the ability to remember visual and olfactory cues used in the memory of locations during trap-line foraging (Montgomery, Merrill, & Ott, 2016), and comparisons of solitary bees showed those with foraging experience had the largest mushroom bodies (Withers, Day, Talbot, Dobson, & Wallace, 2008). In the ant Camponotus floridanus, experienced workers achieve about 50% enlargement of the mushroom bodies compared with base-line naïve workers (Gronenberg, Heeren, & Hölldobler, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studying the response properties and morphology of LOX neurons in the mantis would provide us with fundamental knowledge for understanding the functional organization of the LOX. The LOX consists of two neuropils, the lobula plate and the lobula, in most holometabolous insects such as flies (Ito et al, 2014), beetles (Dreyer et al, 2010), and butterflies (Kinoshita, Shimohigashi, Tominaga, Arikawa, & Homberg, 2015;Montgomery, Merrill, & Ott, 2016). In contrast, the LOX consists of more than three neuropils in several hemimetabolous insects such as cockroaches, locusts, and mantises (Rosner et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%